Biogas production and methanogenic archaeal community in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion processes
- PMID: 24837280
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.025
Biogas production and methanogenic archaeal community in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion processes
Abstract
Over 258 Mt of solid waste are generated annually in Europe, a large fraction of which is biowaste. Sewage sludge is another major waste fraction. In this study, biowaste and sewage sludge were co-digested in an anaerobic digestion reactor (30% and 70% of total wet weight, respectively). The purpose was to investigate the biogas production and methanogenic archaeal community composition in the anaerobic digestion reactor under meso- (35-37 °C) and thermophilic (55-57 °C) processes and an increasing organic loading rate (OLR, 1-10 kg VS m(-3) d(-1)), and also to find a feasible compromise between waste treatment capacity and biogas production without causing process instability. In summary, more biogas was produced with all OLRs by the thermophilic process. Both processes showed a limited diversity of the methanogenic archaeal community which was dominated by Methanobacteriales and Methanosarcinales (e.g. Methanosarcina) in both meso- and thermophilic processes. Methanothermobacter was detected as an additional dominant genus in the thermophilic process. In addition to operating temperatures, the OLRs, the acetate concentration, and the presence of key substrates like propionate also affected the methanogenic archaeal community composition. A bacterial cell count 6.25 times higher than archaeal cell count was observed throughout the thermophilic process, while the cell count ratio varied between 0.2 and 8.5 in the mesophilic process. This suggests that the thermophilic process is more stable, but also that the relative abundance between bacteria and archaea can vary without seriously affecting biogas production.
Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Biogas production; Mesophilic; Methanogenic archaeal community; Organic loading rate; Thermophilic.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Diversity of methanogenic archaea in a biogas reactor fed with swine feces as the mono-substrate by mcrA analysis.Microbiol Res. 2011 Jan 20;166(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Jan 29. Microbiol Res. 2011. PMID: 20116227
-
A comparative study of thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and wheat straw: Process stability and microbial community structure shifts.Waste Manag. 2018 May;75:261-269. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 12. Waste Manag. 2018. PMID: 29449111
-
Microbial communities involved in biogas production from wheat straw as the sole substrate within a two-phase solid-state anaerobic digestion.Syst Appl Microbiol. 2014 Dec;37(8):590-600. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.10.002. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2014. PMID: 25467556
-
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82. Indian J Environ Health. 2001. PMID: 12397675 Review.
-
Metagenome, metatranscriptome, and metaproteome approaches unraveled compositions and functional relationships of microbial communities residing in biogas plants.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Jun;102(12):5045-5063. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-8976-7. Epub 2018 Apr 30. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018. PMID: 29713790 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Biogas Production Systems and Upgrading Technologies: A Review.Food Technol Biotechnol. 2021 Dec;59(4):387-412. doi: 10.17113/ftb.59.04.21.7300. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2021. PMID: 35136365 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Investigation of bacterial and archaeal communities: novel protocols using modern sequencing by Illumina MiSeq and traditional DGGE-cloning.Extremophiles. 2016 Sep;20(5):795-808. doi: 10.1007/s00792-016-0855-5. Epub 2016 Jun 23. Extremophiles. 2016. PMID: 27338271
-
Reviewing the anaerobic digestion and co-digestion process of food waste from the perspectives on biogas production performance and environmental impacts.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Dec;23(24):24435-24450. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7159-2. Epub 2016 Jul 5. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016. PMID: 27380183 Review.
-
Genome Analyses and Genome-Centered Metatranscriptomics of Methanothermobacter wolfeii Strain SIV6, Isolated from a Thermophilic Production-Scale Biogas Fermenter.Microorganisms. 2019 Dec 20;8(1):13. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8010013. Microorganisms. 2019. PMID: 31861790 Free PMC article.
-
Temperature Effects on Methanogenesis and Sulfidogenesis during Anaerobic Digestion of Sulfur-Rich Macroalgal Biomass in Sequencing Batch Reactors.Microorganisms. 2019 Dec 11;7(12):682. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7120682. Microorganisms. 2019. PMID: 31835811 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
- Actions
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources