Patient selection and volume in the era surrounding implementation of Medicare conditions of participation for transplant programs
- PMID: 24838079
- PMCID: PMC4369212
- DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12188
Patient selection and volume in the era surrounding implementation of Medicare conditions of participation for transplant programs
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate evidence of practice changes affecting kidney transplant program volumes, and donor, recipient and candidate selection in the era surrounding the introduction of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) conditions of participation (CoPs) for organ transplant programs.
Data: Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients; CMS ESRD and Medicare claims databases.
Design: Retrospective analysis of national registry data.
Methods: A Cox proportional hazards model of 1-year graft survival was used to derive risks associated with deceased-donor kidney transplants performed from 2001 to 2010.
Findings: Among programs with ongoing noncompliance with the CoPs, kidney transplant volumes declined by 38 percent (n = 766) from 2006 to 2011, including a 55 percent drop in expanded criteria donor transplants. Volume increased by 6 percent (n = 638) among programs remaining in compliance. Aggregate risk of 1-year graft failure increased over time due to increasing recipient age and obesity, and longer ESRD duration.
Conclusions: Although trends in aggregate risk of 1-year kidney graft loss do not indicate that the introduction of the CoPs has systematically reduced opportunities for marginal candidates or that there has been a systematic shift away from utilization of higher risk deceased donor kidneys, total volume and expanded criteria donor utilization decreased overall among programs with ongoing noncompliance.
Keywords: Medicaid; Medicare; kidney transplantation; quality improvement; regulation.
© Health Research and Educational Trust.
Figures



Comment in
-
Considering potential benefits and consequences of hospital report cards: what are the next steps?Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr;50(2):321-9. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12280. Health Serv Res. 2015. PMID: 25756733 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Abboud I, Antoine C, Gaudez F, Fieux F, Lefaucheur C, Pillebout E, Viglietti D, Serrato T, Verine J, Flamant M, Peraldi MN. Glotz D. Pulsatile Perfusion Preservation for Expanded-Criteria Donors Kidneys: Impact on Delayed Graft Function Rate. International Journal of Artificial Organs. 2011;34(6):513–8. - PubMed
-
- Abecassis MM, Burke R, Klintmalm GB, Matas AJ, Merion RM, Millman D, Olthoff K. Roberts JP. American Society of Transplant Surgeons Transplant Center Outcomes Requirements–A Threat to Innovation. American Journal of Transplantation. 2009;9(6):1279–86. - PubMed
-
- Ashby VB, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Wynn JJ, Williams WW, Roberts JP. Leichtman AB. Transplanting Kidneys without Points for HLA-B Matching: Consequences of the Policy Change. American Journal of Transplantation. 2011;11(8):1712–8. - PubMed
-
- Axelrod DA. Balancing Accountable Care with Risk Aversion: Transplantation as a Model. American Journal of Transplantation. 2013;13(1):7–8. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2007. “ Hospital Conditions of Participation: Requirements for Approval and Re-Approval of Transplant Centers To Perform Organ Transplants; Final Rule.” 42 CFR Parts 405, 482, 488 and 498 Medicare Programs. Department of Health & Human Services. Federal Register.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources