Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 16;4(5):e004657.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004657.

Food insecurity among Dutch food bank recipients: a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Food insecurity among Dutch food bank recipients: a cross-sectional study

Judith E Neter et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of (very) low food security among Dutch food bank recipients, and to identify potential demographic, lifestyle and nutrition-related factors associated with (very) low food security.

Setting: 11 of 135 Dutch food banks were selected throughout the Netherlands.

Participants: 251 Dutch food bank recipients participated in the study (93 men and 158 women). Inclusion criteria for participation were: (1) at least 18 years of age, (2) sufficiently fluent in Dutch to participate in oral and written interviews, (3) recipient of a Dutch food bank for at least 1 month and (4) collect own food parcel at the food bank. A single member per household was included.

Primary outcome: Level of food security.

Results: The prevalence of food insecurity was 72.9% (N=183), of which 40.4% (N=74) reported very low food security. Of the very low food secure participants, 56.8% (N=42) reported they were ever hungry but did not eat because they could not afford enough food in the previous 3 months. Adjusted multinomial logistic regression analyses showed that households without children were less likely to experience low food security (OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.88)) and men (OR 0.24 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.51)) were less likely to experience very low food security, while low-educated recipients (OR 5.05 (95% CI 1.37 to 18.61)) were more likely to experience very low food security. Furthermore, recipients with high satisfaction with overall food intake (OR 0.46 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.78)), high perceived healthiness of overall food intake (OR 0.34 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.62)) or high self-efficacy of eating healthy (OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.96)) were less likely to experience very low food security.

Conclusions: Our study showed high prevalence rates of food insecurity among Dutch food bank recipients, and identified subgroups at increased risk of food insecurity. More research is urgently needed on the underlying determinants of food insecurity and the effectiveness of food assistance by food banks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of food insecurity in 251 Dutch food bank recipients, stratified by sex (93 men and 158 women). *Very low food security is different for men, p=0.001 (χ2 test).

References

    1. Anderson S. Core indicators of nutritional state for difficult-to-sample populations. J Nutr 1990;120:1559–600 - PubMed
    1. Tarasuk VS. Household food insecurity with hunger is associated with women's food intakes, health and household circumstances. J Nutr 2001;131:2670–6 - PubMed
    1. Duffy P, Zizza C, Jacoby J, et al. Diet quality is low among female food pantry clients in Eastern Alabama. J Nutr Educ Behav 2009;41:414–19 - PubMed
    1. Kendall A, Olson CM, Frongillo EA. Relationship of hunger and food insecurity to food availability and consumption. J Am Diet Assoc 1996;96:1019–24; quiz 25–6 - PubMed
    1. Robaina KA, Martin KS. Food insecurity, poor diet quality, and obesity among food pantry participants in Hartford, CT. J Nutr Educ Behav 2013;45:159–64 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources