Accelerated lymphocyte recovery after alemtuzumab does not predict multiple sclerosis activity
- PMID: 24838790
- PMCID: PMC4113466
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000520
Accelerated lymphocyte recovery after alemtuzumab does not predict multiple sclerosis activity
Abstract
Objective: To test the hypothesis that accelerated peripheral blood mononuclear cell recovery after alemtuzumab treatment of multiple sclerosis is associated with recurrent disease activity and to investigate the claim that CD4 counts greater than 388.5 × 10(6) cells/mL at 12 months can be used to identify patients who may benefit from further treatment.
Methods: A total of 108 patients were followed for a median of 99 months post alemtuzumab. Patients were classified as active or nonactive after each cycle of treatment based on clinical relapse, increasing disability, or new T2/enhancing MRI lesions. These outcomes were correlated with CD4, CD8, CD19, CD56+ NK, and monocyte counts.
Results: Of 108 patients, 56 (52%) relapsed at some point during follow-up. Mean annualized relapse rate after alemtuzumab was 0.17 vs 1.67 prior to treatment (equating to a 90% reduction). Of 108 patients, 28 (26%) met the criteria for sustained accumulation of disability. Median time to the lower limit of normal for CD19, CD8, and CD4 was 3, 19.5, and 32 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in the recovery of any cell population between patients with and without disease activity or accumulation of disability after treatment.
Conclusion: This study does not support the use of cell counts as biomarkers for identifying patients at greater risk of active disease following treatment with alemtuzumab.
© 2014 American Academy of Neurology.
Figures



Comment in
-
Immune reconstitution and treatment response in multiple sclerosis following alemtuzumab.Neurology. 2014 Jun 17;82(24):2150-1. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000530. Epub 2014 May 16. Neurology. 2014. PMID: 24838787 No abstract available.
-
Mystery case: tanycytic ependymoma of the conus medullaris: a rare cause of low back pain.Neurology. 2014 Jun 17;82(24):e212-3. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000516. Neurology. 2014. PMID: 24960834 No abstract available.
References
-
- Coles AJ, Compston DA, Selmaj KW, et al. Alemtuzumab vs. interferon beta-1a in early multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1786–1801 - PubMed
-
- Cohen JA, Coles AJ, Arnold DL, et al. Alemtuzumab versus interferon beta 1a as first-line treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2012;380:1819–1828 - PubMed
-
- Coles AJ, Twyman CL, Arnold DL, et al. Alemtuzumab for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis after disease-modifying therapy: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2012;380:1829–1839 - PubMed
-
- European Medicines Agency: EPAR summary for the public: Lemtrada (alemtuzumab). Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Summary_for_.... Accessed November 22, 2013
-
- Hill-Cawthorne GA, Button T, Tuohy O, et al. Long term lymphocyte reconstitution after alemtuzumab treatment of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012;83:298–304 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous