Imipramine for neuropathic pain in adults
- PMID: 24838845
- PMCID: PMC6485593
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010769.pub2
Imipramine for neuropathic pain in adults
Abstract
Background: Antidepressants are widely used to treat chronic neuropathic pain (pain due to nerve damage), usually in doses below those at which they exert antidepressant effects. An earlier review that included all antidepressants for neuropathic pain is being replaced by new reviews of individual drugs examining individual neuropathic pain conditions.Imipramine is a tricyclic antidepressant that is occasionally used to treat neuropathic pain.
Objectives: To assess the analgesic efficacy of imipramine for chronic neuropathic pain in adults, and to assess the associated adverse events.
Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE on 18 November 2013, as well as the reference lists of retrieved papers and other reviews. We also used our own handsearched database for older studies, and two clinical trials databases.
Selection criteria: We included randomised, double-blind studies of at least two weeks' duration comparing imipramine with placebo or another active treatment in chronic neuropathic pain. Participants were adults aged 18 and over. We included only articles with full journal publication and extended trial abstracts and summaries.
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently extracted efficacy and adverse event data, and examined issues of study quality. We performed analysis using three tiers of evidence. First tier evidence was derived from data meeting current best standards and subject to minimal risk of bias (outcome equivalent to substantial pain intensity reduction, intention-to-treat analysis without imputation for dropouts; at least 200 participants in the comparison, 8 to 12 weeks duration, parallel design); second tier from data that failed to meet one or more of these criteria and were considered at some risk of bias but with adequate numbers in the comparison; and third tier from data involving small numbers of participants which was considered very likely to be biased or used outcomes of limited clinical utility, or both.
Main results: Five studies treated 168 participants with painful diabetic neuropathy or polyneuropathy. The mean age in individual studies was between 47 and 56 years. Four studies used a cross-over, and one a parallel group design; 126 participants were randomised to receive imipramine 25 mg to 350 mg daily (most took 100 mg to 150 mg daily). Comparators were placebo (an active placebo in one study), paroxetine, mianserin, venlafaxine, and amitriptyline, and treatment was given for 2 to 12 weeks. All studies had one or more sources of potential major bias.No study provided first or second tier evidence for any outcome. No data were available on the proportion of people with at least 50% or 30% reduction in pain or equivalent, and data were available from only one study for our other primary outcome of Patient Global Impression of Change, reported as patient evaluation of pain relief of complete or good. No pooling of data was possible, but third tier evidence in individual studies indicated some improvement in pain relief with imipramine compared with placebo, although this is was very low quality evidence, derived mainly from group mean data and completer analyses, in small, short duration studies where major bias is possible.Four studies reported some information about adverse events, but reporting was inconsistent and fragmented, and the quality of evidence was very low. Participants taking imipramine generally experienced more adverse events, notably dry mouth, and a higher rate of withdrawal due to adverse events, than did participants taking placebo.
Authors' conclusions: This review found little evidence to support the use of imipramine to treat neuropathic pain. There was very low quality evidence of benefit but this came from studies that were methodologically flawed and potentially subject to major bias. Effective medicines with much greater supportive evidence are available.
Conflict of interest statement
LH and TP have no known conflicts of interest. SD, PW, and RAM have received research support from charities, government and industry at various times, but none related to this review. In the last five years RAM and PW have consulted for, and RAM has received lecture fees from, various pharmaceutical companies related to analgesics and other healthcare interventions.
Figures
Update of
- doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010769
References
References to studies included in this review
Kvinesdal 1984 {published data only}
-
- Kvinesdal B, Molin J, Froland A, Gram LF. Imipramine in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy of the extremities [Imipramin ved behandling af smerter ved diabetisk ekstremitetsneuropati]. Ugeskrift for Laeger 1983;145(39):3018‐9. - PubMed
-
- Kvinesdal B, Molin J, Froland A, Gram LF. Imipramine treatment for painful diabetic neuropathy. Journal American Medical Association 1984;251(13):1727‐30. - PubMed
Sindrup 1990 {published data only}
-
- Sindrup SH, Gram LF, Brosen K, Eshoj O, Mogensen EF. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine is effective in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy symptoms. Pain 1990;42:135‐44. - PubMed
Sindrup 1992 {published data only}
-
- Sindrup SH, Tuxen C, Gram LF, Grodum E, Skjold T, Brosen K, Beck‐Nielsen H. Lack of effect of mianserin on the symptoms of diabetic neuropathy. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1992;43:251‐5. - PubMed
Sindrup 2003 {published data only}
-
- Sindrup SH, Bach FW, Madsen C, et al. Venlafaxine versus imipramine in painful polyneuropathy: a randomized, controlled trial. Neurology 2003;60:1284‐9. - PubMed
Turkington 1980 {published data only}
-
- Turkington RW. Depression masquerading as diabetic neuropathy. Journal American Medical Association 1980;243(11):1147‐50. - PubMed
References to studies excluded from this review
Kvinesdal 1985 {published data only}
-
- Kvinesdal B, Molin J, Frøland A, Gram LF. Antidepressive agents in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy. Clinical Physiology 1985;5 (Suppl):97‐100. - PubMed
Minotti 1998 {published data only}
-
- Minotti V, Angelis V, Righetti E, Celani MG, et al. Double‐blind evaluation of short‐term analgesic efficacy of orally administered diclofenac, diclofenac plus codeine, and diclofenac plus imipramine in chronic cancer pain. Pain 1998;74:133‐7. - PubMed
Rasmussen 2004 {published data only}
-
- Rasmussen PV, Jensen TS, Sindrup SH, Bach FW. TDM‐based imipramine treatment in neuropathic pain. Ther Drug Monit 2004;26(4):352‐60. - PubMed
Sindrup 1989 {published data only}
-
- Sindrup SH, Ejlertsen B, Froland A, Sindrup EH, Brosen K, Gram LF. Imipramine treatment in diabetic neuropathy: relief of subjective symptoms without changes in peripheral and autonomic nerve function. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1989;37:151‐3. - PubMed
Additional references
Apkarian 2011
Attal 2010
AUREF 2012
-
- PaPaS author and referee guidance. http://papas.cochrane.org/papas‐documents (accessed 22 January 2013).
Bouhassira 2008
Chronicle 2004
Derry 2012
Derry 2013
Dworkin 2008
Dworkin 2010
Elbourne 2002
Finnerup 2010
Gustorff 2008
Hall 2008
Higgins 2011
-
- Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Jadad 1996
-
- Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17(1):1‐12. [DOI: ] - PubMed
Jensen 2011
Katusic 1991
-
- Katusic S, Williams DB, Beard CM, Bergstralh EJ, Kurland LT. Epidemiology and clinical features of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia and glossopharyngeal neuralgia: similarities and differences, Rochester, Minnesota,1945‐1984. Neuroepidemiology 1991;10:276‐81. - PubMed
Khaliq 2007
Khan 1996
-
- Khan KS, Daya S, Jadad A. The importance of quality of primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviews. Archives of Internal Medicine 1996;156(6):661‐6. - PubMed
Koopman 2009
L'Abbé 1987
-
- L'Abbé KA, Detsky AS, O'Rourke K. Meta‐analysis in clinical research. Annals of Internal Medicine 1987;107:224‐33. - PubMed
Lunn 2014
McQuay 1998
-
- McQuay H, Moore R. An evidence‐based resource for pain relief. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
McQuay 2007
-
- McQuay HJ, Smith LA, Moore RA. Chronic Pain. In: Stevens A, Raftery J, Mant J, Simpson S editor(s). Health Care Needs Assessment. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing, 2007. [ISBN: 978‐1‐84619‐063‐6]
Moisset 2007
Moore 1998
Moore 2008
-
- Moore RA, Barden J, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Managing potential publication bias. In: McQuay HJ, Kalso E, Moore RA editor(s). Systematic Reviews in Pain Research: Methodology Refined. Seattle: IASP Press, 2008:15‐24. [ISBN: 978–0–931092–69–5]
Moore 2009a
Moore 2009b
-
- Moore RA, Moore OA, Derry S, Peloso PM, Gammaitoni AR, Wang H. Responder analysis for pain relief and numbers needed to treat in a meta‐analysis of etoricoxib osteoarthritis trials: bridging a gap between clinical trials and clinical practice. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2010;69(2):374‐9. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed
Moore 2010a
-
- Moore RA, Eccleston C, Derry S, Wiffen P, Bell RF, Straube S, et al. "Evidence" in chronic pain ‐ establishing best practice in the reporting of systematic reviews. Pain 2010;150(3):386‐9. [DOI: ] - PubMed
Moore 2010b
-
- Moore RA, Moore OA, Derry S, Peloso PM, Gammaitoni AR, Wang H. Responder analysis for pain relief and numbers needed to treat in a meta‐analysis of etoricoxib osteoarthritis trials: bridging a gap between clinical trials and clinical practice. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2010;69(2):374‐9. [DOI: ] - PMC - PubMed
Moore 2010c
Moore 2010d
Moore 2010e
-
- Moore RA, Smugar SS, Wang H, Peloso PM, Gammaitoni A. Numbers‐needed‐to‐treat analyses‐‐do timing, dropouts, and outcome matter? Pooled analysis of two randomized, placebo‐controlled chronic low back pain trials. Pain 2010;151(3):592‐7. [DOI: ] - PubMed
Moore 2011a
Moore 2011b
-
- Moore RA, Straube S, Paine J, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Minimum efficacy criteria for comparisons between treatments using individual patient meta‐analysis of acute pain trials: examples of etoricoxib, paracetamol, ibuprofen, and ibuprofen/paracetamol combinations after third molar extraction. Pain 2011;152(5):982‐9. [DOI: ] - PubMed
Moore 2011c
Moore 2012a
Moore 2012b
Moore 2013a
Moore 2013b
Moore 2013c
Moore 2014
Moulin 2007
NICE 2013
-
- NICE clinical guideline 173. Neuropathic pain – pharmacological management. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG173 (accessed 4 December 2013) 2013:1‐138.
Nüesch 2010
O'Brien 2010
O'Connor 2009
Rappaport 1994
RevMan 2012 [Computer program]
-
- The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
Soni 2013
Straube 2008
-
- Straube S, Derry S, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Enriched enrollment: definition and effects of enrichment and dose in trials of pregabalin and gabapentin in neuropathic pain. A systematic review. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2008;66(2):266‐75. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03200.x] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Straube 2010
Sultan 2008
Torrance 2006
Tracey 2011
-
- Tracey I. Can neuroimaging studies identify pain endophenotypes in humans?. Nature Reviews Neurology 2011;7(3):173‐81. [doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2011.4] - PubMed
Treede 2008
Vos 2012
-
- Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859):2163‐96. [DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Watson 2013
-
- Watson CPN, Gilron I, Pollock BG, Lipman, AG, Smith MT. Antidepressant analgesics. In: McMahon SB, Koltzenburg M, Tracey I, Turk DC editor(s). Wall and Melzack's Textbook of Pain. 6th Edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2013:465‐90. [ISBN: 978‐0‐7020‐4059‐7]
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical