The effects of percentile versus fixed criterion schedules on smoking with equal incentive magnitude for initial abstinence
- PMID: 24840638
- PMCID: PMC4464751
- DOI: 10.1037/a0036935
The effects of percentile versus fixed criterion schedules on smoking with equal incentive magnitude for initial abstinence
Abstract
Incentives have been successfully used to reduce smoking in hard-to-treat (HTT) smokers by progressively reinforcing lower levels of breath carbon monoxide (CO). When compared with schedules only providing incentives for smoking abstinence, using a progressive (percentile) criterion facilitates longer periods of smoking abstinence. However, participants receiving incentives for lower breath CO levels on percentile schedules typically earn more for their first abstinent breath CO sample relative to participants receiving incentives only for smoking abstinence. Many studies show that larger incentive magnitude increases abstinence rates. The present study tested the effects of different incentive schedules on rates of abstinence maintenance while holding the initial incentive magnitude constant for 93 HTT smokers to eliminate initial abstinence incentive magnitude as a potential confound. Smokers were randomized to percentile, fixed criterion, or random incentive schedules. The incentive magnitude for the first abstinent breath CO sample (<3 ppm) was $5 for percentile and fixed criterion incentive participants, and then increased by $0.50 for each consecutive abstinent breath CO sample. All groups had similar patterns of meeting the abstinence criterion for at least 1 visit. However, once this abstinence criterion was met, abstinence was more likely to be maintained by fixed criterion incentive participants. Unlike previous studies comparing percentile and fixed criterion schedules, percentile incentive schedules were not associated with longer periods of abstinence relative to fixed criterion incentive schedules. Further studies that manipulate initial incentive magnitude are needed to test whether the difference between the current and previous studies was due to initial incentive magnitude.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The effects of fixed versus escalating reinforcement schedules on smoking abstinence.J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):25-37. doi: 10.1002/jaba.185. Epub 2015 Jan 30. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015. PMID: 25640764 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of escalating and descending schedules of incentives on cigarette smoking in smokers without plans to quit.J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Fall;43(3):357-67. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-357. J Appl Behav Anal. 2010. PMID: 21358898 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Shaping smoking cessation using percentile schedules.Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Dec 7;76(3):247-59. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.05.008. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004. PMID: 15561476 Clinical Trial.
-
Recent marijuana blunt smoking impacts carbon monoxide as a measure of adolescent tobacco abstinence.Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40(2):231-40. doi: 10.1081/ja-200048461. Subst Use Misuse. 2005. PMID: 15770886 Review.
-
Contingency management for smokers with mental health disorders and smoking-sensitive conditions caused or exacerbated by tobacco use: A review of existing studies, intervention parameters, and research priorities.Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023 Apr;31(2):560-573. doi: 10.1037/pha0000585. Epub 2022 Jun 23. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023. PMID: 35737555
Cited by
-
Incentives for smoking cessation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 17;7(7):CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 13;1:CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub7. PMID: 31313293 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Incentives for smoking cessation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 13;1(1):CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub7. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 39799985
-
A Text Message Intervention with Adaptive Goal Support to Reduce Alcohol Consumption Among Non-Treatment-Seeking Young Adults: Non-Randomized Clinical Trial with Voluntary Length of Enrollment.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Feb 16;6(2):e35. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8530. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018. PMID: 29453191 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of fixed versus escalating reinforcement schedules on smoking abstinence.J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):25-37. doi: 10.1002/jaba.185. Epub 2015 Jan 30. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015. PMID: 25640764 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Further psychometric analysis of the 20-item Partner Interaction Questionnaire in an adult sample of smokers.Psychol Addict Behav. 2019 Sep;33(6):567-573. doi: 10.1037/adb0000477. Epub 2019 Jun 13. Psychol Addict Behav. 2019. PMID: 31192622 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Catania AC. Learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1998.
-
- Correia CJ, Sigmon SC, Silverman K, Bigelow G, Stitzer ML. A comparison of voucher-delivery schedules for the initiation of cocaine abstinence. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2005;13:253–258. - PubMed
-
- Gilbert DG, Crauthers DM, Mooney DK, McClernon FJ, Jensen RA. Effects of monetary contingencies on smoking relapse: Influences of trait depression, personality, and habitual nicotine intake. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 1999;7:174–181. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous