Conceptualizing genetic counseling as psychotherapy in the era of genomic medicine
- PMID: 24841456
- PMCID: PMC4318692
- DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9728-1
Conceptualizing genetic counseling as psychotherapy in the era of genomic medicine
Abstract
Discussions about genetic contributions to medical illness have become increasingly commonplace. Physicians and other health-care providers in all quarters of medicine, from oncology to psychiatry, routinely field questions about the genetic basis of the medical conditions they treat. Communication about genetic testing and risk also enter into these conversations, as knowledge about genetics is increasingly expected of all medical specialists. Attendant to this evolving medical landscape is some uncertainty regarding the future of the genetic counseling profession, with the potential for both increases and decreases in demand for genetic counselors being possible outcomes. This emerging uncertainty provides the opportunity to explicitly conceptualize the potentially distinct value and contributions of the genetic counselor over and above education about genetics and risk that may be provided by other health professionals. In this paper we suggest conceptualizing genetic counseling as a highly circumscribed form of psychotherapy in which effective communication of genetic information is a central therapeutic goal. While such an approach is by no means new--in 1979 Seymour Kessler explicitly described genetic counseling as a "kind of psychotherapeutic encounter," an "interaction with a psychotherapeutic potential"--we expand on his view, and provide research evidence in support of our position. We review available evidence from process and outcome studies showing that genetic counseling is a therapeutic encounter that cannot be reduced to one where the counselor performs a simple "conduit for information" function, without losing effectiveness. We then discuss potential barriers that may have impeded greater uptake of a psychotherapeutic model of practice, and close by discussing implications for practice.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors Austin, Semaka and Hadjipavlou declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
Commentary on "Conceptualizing genetic counseling as psychotherapy in the era of genomic medicine".J Genet Couns. 2014 Dec;23(6):935-7. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9734-3. Epub 2014 Jul 19. J Genet Couns. 2014. PMID: 25037457 No abstract available.
References
-
- Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling (a) [Accessed 23rd Dec 2013];Practice based competencies for genetic counselors. 2013 http://gceducation.org/Documents/ACGC%20Practice%20Based%20Competencies_....
-
- Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling (b) [Accessed 23rd Dec 2013];Standards of accreditation for graduate programs in genetic counseling. 2013 http://gceducation.org/Documents/Standards%20Final%20approved%20Feb%2020....
-
- American Psychological Association. Recognition of Psychotherapy Effectiveness. Psychotherapy. 2013;50(1):102–109. - PubMed
-
- Biesecker B. Goals of genetic counseling. Clinical Genetics. 2003;60:323–330. - PubMed
-
- Biesecker B. Back to the Future of Genetic Counseling: Commentary on “Psychosocial Genetic Counseling in the Post-Nondirective Era”. 2003. pp. 1–5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
