Comparison of daily glucose excursion by continuous glucose monitoring between type 2 diabetic patients receiving biphasic insulin aspart 30 or biphasic human insulin 30
- PMID: 24843521
- PMCID: PMC4019310
- DOI: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2011.00123.x
Comparison of daily glucose excursion by continuous glucose monitoring between type 2 diabetic patients receiving biphasic insulin aspart 30 or biphasic human insulin 30
Abstract
Aims/Introduction: Biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) has an earlier and stronger peak effect with a similar duration of action to biphasic human insulin 30 (BHI 30). However, direct comparison of daily glucose excursion during treatment with these two types of insulin has not been carried out.
Materials and methods: We carried out continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and evaluated the 48-h glucose profile during twice-daily injections of BIAsp 30 or BHI 30 at the same dosage in 12 hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes who participated in a randomized cross-over trial.
Results: The 48-h average glucose level and mean amplitude of glucose excursion (MAGE) were lower during BIAsp 30 treatment than with BHI 30. The average glucose level during 2-3 h after breakfast and 2-4 h after dinner, and the incremental postprandial glucose from just before to 4 h after dinner were lower with BIAsp 30 treatment than with BHI 30. Furthermore, BIAsp 30 treatment reduced the SD from 30 min before to 4 h after breakfast and lunch compared with BHI 30. The average glucose level and SD during the 30 min before each meal and during the night were not different between the two insulin preparations, and hypoglycemia was not observed with either treatment.
Conclusions: Twice-daily BIAsp 30 reduced the 48-h average glucose and MAGE, the postprandial glucose (after breakfast and dinner), and the SD of glucose excursion (after breakfast and lunch) compared with the same dosage of BHI 30, without causing hypoglycemia or deterioration of glycemic control before meals and at night. This trial was registered with UMIN (no. UMIN000005129). (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2011.00123.x, 2011).
Keywords: Biphasic human insulin 30; Biphasic insulin aspart 30; Continuous glucose monitoring.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 versus biphasic human insulin 30: a double-blind crossover study in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Clin Ther. 2002 Apr;24(4):530-9. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85129-3. Clin Ther. 2002. PMID: 12017398 Clinical Trial.
-
An exploratory study of the effect of using high-mix biphasic insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 Jul;11(7):680-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.01024.x. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009. PMID: 19527481 Clinical Trial.
-
[Comparison on the efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart 30 and premixed human insulin 30/70 through continuous glucose monitoring system].Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Aug;32(8):827-9. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2011. PMID: 22093477 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Biphasic insulin aspart 30: literature review of adverse events associated with treatment.Clin Ther. 2005;27 Suppl B:S75-88. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.022. Clin Ther. 2005. PMID: 16519039 Review.
-
Biphasic insulin aspart in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an evidence-based medicine review.Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(5):299-324. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727050-00002. Clin Drug Investig. 2007. PMID: 17451279 Review.
Cited by
-
15 Years of Experience with Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Type 2 Diabetes.Drugs R D. 2018 Mar;18(1):27-39. doi: 10.1007/s40268-018-0228-x. Drugs R D. 2018. PMID: 29468559 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Premixed Human Insulin 30/70 to Biphasic Aspart 30 in Well-Controlled Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring.J Clin Med. 2021 May 5;10(9):1982. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091982. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34063071 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Blood Glucose Variability Between Exenatide and Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 in Chinese Participants with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin Monotherapy: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Trial.Diabetes Ther. 2020 Oct;11(10):2313-2328. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00904-z. Epub 2020 Aug 27. Diabetes Ther. 2020. PMID: 32856226 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jacobsen LV, Søgaard B, Riis A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a premixed formulation of soluble and protamine‐retarded insulin aspart. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 56: 399–403 - PubMed
-
- McNally PG, Wilkinson PD, Dean JD, et al. Using continuous glucose monitoring to measure the frequency of low glucose values when using biphasic insulin aspart 30 compared with biphasic human insulin 30. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 1044–1048 - PubMed
-
- Davidson JA, Liebl A, Christiansen JS, et al. Risk for nocturnal hypoglycemia with biphasic insulin aspart 30 compared with biphasic human insulin 30 in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta‐analysis. Clin Ther 2009; 31: 1641–1651 - PubMed
-
- The Committee of Japan Diabetes Society on the diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus . Report of the committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus. J Japan Diab Soc 2010; 53: 450–467
-
- Service F, Molnar GD, Rosevear JW, et al. Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability. Diabetes 1970; 19: 644–655 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources