Ethical dilemmas in protecting individual rights versus public protection in the case of infectious diseases
- PMID: 24847171
- PMCID: PMC3988619
- DOI: 10.4137/IDRT.S11205
Ethical dilemmas in protecting individual rights versus public protection in the case of infectious diseases
Abstract
Infectious diseases-including emerging and re-emerging diseases such as Ebola and tuberculosis-continue to be important causes of morbidity and mortality in the globalizing, contemporary world. This article discusses the ethical issues associated with protecting the rights of individuals versus the protection of the health of populations in the case of infectious diseases. The discussion uses the traditional medical ethics approach together with the public health approach presented by Faden and Shebaya.3 Infectious diseases such as Ebola hemorrhagic fever, Nipah virus and HIV/AIDS (together with tuberculosis) will be used to illustrate particular points in the discussion.
Keywords: ethics; individual rights; infectious diseases; public protection.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Ebola in Uganda—update. Nov 30, 2012. [Accessed Dec 13, 2012]. Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/don/2012_11_30_ebola/en/index.html.
-
- Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
-
- Faden R, Shebaya S. Public health ethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2010. [Accessed Dec 13, 2012]. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/publichealthethics/
-
- Burgess DC, Burgess MA, Leask J. The MMR vaccination and autism controversy in the United Kingdom 1998–2005: inevitable community outrage or a failure of risk communication? Vaccine. 2006;24(18):3921–8. - PubMed
-
- Somaini B, Grob P. How and why AIDS changed drug policy in Switzerland. J Public Health Policy. 2012;33(3):317–24. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
