A comparative study on two different pathological methods to retrieve lymph nodes following gastrectomy
- PMID: 24851719
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.057
A comparative study on two different pathological methods to retrieve lymph nodes following gastrectomy
Abstract
Background: The number of lymph nodes harvested during gastrectomy depends on the extension of lymphadenectomy and the method of lymph node retrieval.
Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate two methods of lymph node retrieval in specimens of gastric cancer.
Methods: The number of lymph nodes was compared using two different techniques. The technique used in the first group was manual dissection following formalin fixation, and the techniques used in the second group was fat-clearing by acetone.
Results: Both groups were comparable for demographic and pathological variables. The average number of harvested nodes was 19.3 ± 10 for the manual group as compared to 26.1 ± 14 in the acetone group (P = 0.003). The differences in the average number of positive nodes did not reach statistical significance (4.6 compared to 6.9 nodes).
Conclusion: The acetone clearing technique enables the evaluation of a larger number of nodes. An increase, but statistically non significant, number of positive nodes was noted in the acetone group.
Keywords: Gastrectomy; Lymph node retrieval; Lymphadenectomy.
Copyright © 2014 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Carnoy's solution increases the number of examined lymph nodes following gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a randomized trial.Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jan;19(1):136-42. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0443-2. Epub 2014 Nov 20. Gastric Cancer. 2016. PMID: 25410474 Clinical Trial.
-
[Advantage of perisplenic hilar lymph node dissection by laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (D2) over conventional open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer].Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011 Nov;33(11):864-7. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011. PMID: 22335955 Chinese.
-
Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug;36(4):325-30. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318246b4e9. Am J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 22547011
-
Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extraperigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer.J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;91(1):90-4. doi: 10.1002/jso.20271. J Surg Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15999352 Review.
-
Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: are we making progress?Lancet. 1993 Sep 18;342(8873):713-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91711-t. Lancet. 1993. PMID: 8103825 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Labeling of active proteases in fresh-frozen tissues by topical application of quenched activity-based probes.Nat Protoc. 2016 Jan;11(1):184-91. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.004. Epub 2015 Dec 30. Nat Protoc. 2016. PMID: 26716706
-
Ex Vivo Lymphadenectomy During Gastrectomy for Adenocarcinoma Optimizes Lymph Node Yield.J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jan;20(1):165-71; discussion 171. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2948-3. Epub 2015 Sep 24. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016. PMID: 26403717 Free PMC article.
-
Surgeon Assessment of Gastric Cancer Lymph Node Specimens with a Video of Technique.J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Nov;22(11):2013-2019. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3880-0. Epub 2018 Jul 27. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018. PMID: 30054780
-
Surgeon-Pathologist Team Approach Dramatically Affects Lymph Nodes Detection and Improves Patients' Short-Term Outcome.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 18;14(4):1034. doi: 10.3390/cancers14041034. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35205783 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of Gastric Cancer Means Surgery, but Not Surgery Alone.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 22;16(8):1601. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081601. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38672682 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical