One Health: past successes and future challenges in three African contexts
- PMID: 24851901
- PMCID: PMC4031173
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002884
One Health: past successes and future challenges in three African contexts
Abstract
Background: The recent emergence of zoonotic diseases such as Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) have contributed to dominant Global Health narratives around health securitisation and pandemic preparedness, calling for greater co-operation between the health, veterinary and environmental sectors in the ever-evolving One Health movement. A decade later, One Health advocates face increasing pressure to translate the approach from theory into action.
Methodology/principal findings: A qualitative case study methodology was used to examine the emerging relationships between international One Health dialogue and its practical implementation in the African health policy context. A series of Key Informant Interviews (n = 32) with policy makers, government officials and academics in Nigeria, Tanzania and Uganda are presented as three separate case studies. Each case examines a significant aspect of One Health operationalisation, framed around the control of both emerging and Neglected Zoonotic Diseases including HPAI, Human African Trypanosomiasis and rabies. The research found that while there is general enthusiasm and a strong affirmative argument for adoption of One Health approaches in Africa, identifying alternative contexts away from a narrow focus on pandemics will help broaden its appeal, particularly for national or regionally significant endemic and neglected diseases not usually addressed under a "global" remit.
Conclusions/significance: There is no 'one size fits all' approach to achieving the intersectoral collaboration, significant resource mobilisation and political co-operation required to realise a One Health approach. Individual country requirements cannot be underestimated, dismissed or prescribed in a top down manner. This article contributes to the growing discussion regarding not whether One Health should be operationalised, but how this may be achieved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Zinsstag J, Schelling E, Wyss K, Mahamat MB (2005) Potential of cooperation between human and animal health to strengthen health systems. Lancet 366: 2142–45. - PubMed
-
- Okello A, Gibbs EPJ, Vandersmissen A, Welburn SC (2011) One Health and the Neglected Zoonoses: Turning Rhetoric into Reality. Vet Rec 169: 281–285 doi:10.1136/vr.d5378 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chien Y-J (2013) How did international agencies perceive the avian influenza problem? The adoption and manufacture of the ‘One World, One Health’ framework. Sociol Health Illn 35 2: 213–226 doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01534.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Scoones I (2010) Avian Influenza: Science, Policy and Politics. Earthscan: UK. 261p.
-
- Integrated Control of Neglected Zoonoses in Africa: Adapting the “One Health” concept. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2008/WHO_HTM_NTD_NZD_2008.1_eng.pdf. 17th September 2013.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
