Study product adherence measurement in the iPrEx placebo-controlled trial: concordance with drug detection
- PMID: 24853306
- PMCID: PMC4110718
- DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000216
Study product adherence measurement in the iPrEx placebo-controlled trial: concordance with drug detection
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the concordance between adherence estimated by self-report (in-person interview or computer-assisted self-interview), in-clinic pill counts, and pharmacy dispensation records and drug detection among participants in a placebo-controlled pre-exposure prophylaxis HIV prevention trial (iPrEx).
Design: Cross-sectional evaluation of 510 participants who had drug concentration data and matched adherence assessments from their week-24 study visit.
Methods: Self-reported adherence collected through (1) interview and (2) computer-assisted self-interview surveys, (3) adherence estimated by pill count, and (4) medication possession ratio was contrasted to having a detectable level of drug concentrations [either tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) or emtricitabine triphosphate (FTC-TP)], as well as to having evidence of consistent dosing (tenofovir diphosphate ≥ 16 fmol/10⁶ cells), focusing on positive predictive values, overall and by research site.
Results: Overall, self-report and pharmacy records suggested high rates of product use (over 90% adherence); however, large discrepancies between these measures and drug detection were noted, which varied considerably between sites (positive predictive values from 34% to 62%). Measures of adherence performed generally well in the US sites but had poor accuracy in other research locations. Medication possession ratio outperformed other measures but still had relatively low discrimination.
Conclusions: The sizable discrepancy between adherence measures and drug detection in certain regions highlights the potential contribution of factors that may have incentivized efforts to seem adherent. Understanding the processes driving adherence reporting in some settings, but not others, is essential for finding effective ways to increase accuracy in measurement of product use and may generalize to promotion efforts for open-label pre-exposure prophylaxis.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no financial conflicts of interest.
References
-
- van der Straten A, Van Damme L, Haberer JE, Bangsberg DR. Unraveling the divergent results of pre-exposure prophylaxis trials for HIV prevention. AIDS. 2012;26:F13–F19. - PubMed
-
- Thompson MA, Mugavero MJ, Amico KR, Cargill VA, Chang LW, Gross R, et al. Guidelines for improving entry into and retention in care and antiretroviral adherence for persons with HIV: evidence-based recommendations from an International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care panel. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:817–833. W-284, W-285, W-286, W-287, W-288, W-289, W-290, W-291, W-292, W-293, W-294. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Marrazzo J, Ramjee G, Nair G, Palanee T, Mkhize B, Nakabiito C, et al. 20th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. Altanta, Gorgia: USA; 2013. Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for HIV in Women: Daily Oral Tenofovir, Oral Tenofovir/Emtricitabine, or Vaginal Tenofovir Gel in the VOICE Study (MTN 003)
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
