Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study
- PMID: 24853851
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3560-4
Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH), although safely feasible in experienced hands and in selected patients, is a formidable challenge because of the technical demands of controlling hemorrhage, sealing bile ducts, avoiding gas embolism, and maintaining oncologic surgical principles. The enhanced surgical dexterity offered by robotic assistance could improve feasibility and/or safety of minimally invasive major hepatectomy. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of LMH and robotic-assisted major hepatectomy (RMH).
Methods: Pooled data from four Italian hepatobiliary centers were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic data, operative, and postoperative outcomes were collected from prospectively maintained databases and compared.
Results: Between January 2009 and December 2012, 25 patients underwent LMH and 25 RMH. The two groups were comparable for all baseline characteristics including type of resection and underlying pathology. Conversion to open surgery was required in one patient in each group (4%). No difference was noted in operative time, estimated blood, and need for allogenic blood transfusions. Intermittent pedicle occlusion was required only in LMH (32% vs. 0; p = 0.004). Length of hospital stay, including time spent in intensive care unit, was similar between the two groups, but patients undergoing LMH showed quicker recovery of bowel activity, with shorter time to first flatus (1 vs. 3 days; p = 0.023) and earlier tolerance to oral liquid diet (1 vs. 2 days; p = 0.001). No difference was noted in complication rate, 90-day mortality, and readmission rate.
Conclusions: This retrospective multi-institution study confirms that selected patients can safely undergo minimally invasive major hepatectomy, either LMH or RMH. The fact that intermittent pedicle occlusion could be avoided in RMH suggests improved surgical ability to deal with bleeding during liver transection, but further studies are needed before any final conclusion can be drawn.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of safety and effectiveness between robotic and laparoscopic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Surg. 2023 Dec 1;109(12):4333-4346. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000750. Int J Surg. 2023. PMID: 37720925 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2021 Feb;35(2):524-535. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08008-2. Epub 2020 Sep 28. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID: 32989544
-
Early experience with totally laparoscopic major hepatectomies: single institution experience with 31 consecutive cases.ANZ J Surg. 2018 Apr;88(4):E329-E333. doi: 10.1111/ans.13959. Epub 2017 May 3. ANZ J Surg. 2018. PMID: 28470679
-
Major hepatectomy for primary hepatolithiasis: a comparative study of laparoscopic versus open treatment.Surg Endosc. 2018 Oct;32(10):4271-4276. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6176-2. Epub 2018 Apr 3. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29616339 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic minor hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 30;100(17):e25648. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025648. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021. PMID: 33907124 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison.Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):1004-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4284-9. Epub 2015 Jun 27. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26123328
-
Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery for Hepatic Colorectal Metastases.Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2016 Apr;12(2):103-112. doi: 10.1007/s11888-016-0316-7. Epub 2016 Mar 8. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2016. PMID: 27570500 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic hepatic surgery in malignancy: review of the current literature.J Robot Surg. 2019 Aug;13(4):533-538. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00939-w. Epub 2019 Mar 20. J Robot Surg. 2019. PMID: 30895519 Review.
-
Fully robotic left hepatectomy for malignant tumor: technique and initial results.Updates Surg. 2019 Mar;71(1):129-135. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0560-2. Epub 2018 Jul 6. Updates Surg. 2019. PMID: 29981056
-
Comparative clinical outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection versus laparoscopic liver resection: A meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 13;15(10):e0240593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240593. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33048989 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources