Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis
- PMID: 24853855
- PMCID: PMC4186976
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3564-0
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis
Erratum in
- Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct;28(10):2996-7
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic rectal surgery involving rectal transection and anastomosis with stapling devices is technically difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) after laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) with double-stapling technique (DST) anastomosis.
Methods: This was a retrospective single-institution study of 154 rectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR with DST anastomosis between June 2005 and August 2013. Patient-, tumor-, and surgery-related variables were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. The outcome of interest was clinical AL.
Results: The overall AL rate was 12.3% (19/154). In univariate analysis, tumor size (P = 0.001), operative time (P = 0.049), intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.037), lateral lymph node dissection (P = 0.009), multiple firings of the linear stapler (P = 0.041), and precompression before stapler firings (P = 0.008) were significantly associated with AL. Multivariate analysis identified tumor size (odds ratio [OR] 4.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-12.89; P = 0.02) and precompression before stapler firings (OR 4.58; CI 1.22-17.20; P = 0.024) as independent risk factors for AL. In particular, precompression before stapler firing tended to reduce the AL occurring in early postoperative period.
Conclusions: Using appropriate techniques, laparoscopic LAR with DST anastomosis can be performed safely without increasing the risk of AL. Important risk factors for AL were tumor size and precompression before stapler firings.
Similar articles
-
Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis.World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 7;22(25):5718-27. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i25.5718. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27433085 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning model to predict multiple firings in double-stapled colorectal anastomosis.World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 21;29(3):536-548. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i3.536. World J Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 36688017 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer.Am J Surg. 2011 Sep;202(3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.11.014. Am J Surg. 2011. PMID: 21871980
-
Nomogram to predict anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer.Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Jul-Aug;61(133):1257-61. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014. PMID: 25436293
-
Impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Sep;24(9):919-925. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02240-7. Epub 2020 May 25. Tech Coloproctol. 2020. PMID: 32451807
Cited by
-
Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity after right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: results from a prospective, multi-centre, snapshot study in China.Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1):znad316. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad316. Br J Surg. 2024. PMID: 37943801 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Attitudes Toward Initiation of Immediate Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer.J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:658-665. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.024. Epub 2022 Nov 28. J Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 36455419 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis.World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 7;22(25):5718-27. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i25.5718. World J Gastroenterol. 2016. PMID: 27433085 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?Curr Oncol. 2023 Mar 7;30(3):3111-3137. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030236. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36975449 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Relationship Between the Number of Intersections of Staple Lines and Anastomotic Leakage After the Use of a Double Stapling Technique in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):273-281. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000422. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017. PMID: 28614172 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:1718–1726. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lelong B, Bege T, Esterni B, Guiramand J, Turrini O, Moutardier V, Magnin V, Monges G, Pernoud N, Blache JL, Giovannini M, Delpero JR. Short-term outcome after laparoscopic or open restorative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:176–183. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0751-7. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous