Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;54(2):114-143.
doi: 10.1086/669563.

Response Diversity and Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems

Paul Leslie  1 , J Terrence McCabe  2
Affiliations

Response Diversity and Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems

Paul Leslie et al. Curr Anthropol. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Recent work in ecology suggests that the diversity of responses to environmental change among species contributing to the same ecosystem function can strongly influence ecosystem resilience. To render this important realization more useful for understanding coupled human-natural systems, we broaden the concept of response diversity to include heterogeneity in human decisions and action. Simply put, not all actors respond the same way to challenges, opportunities, and risks. The range, prevalence, and spatial and temporal distributions of different responses may be crucial to the resilience or the transformation of a social-ecological system, and thus have a bearing on human vulnerability and well-being in the face of environmental, socioeconomic, and political change. Response diversity can be seen at multiple scales (e.g., household, village, region) and response diversity at one scale may act synergistically with or contrary to the effects of diversity at another scale. Although considerable research on the sources of response diversity has been done, our argument is that the consequences of response diversity warrant closer attention. We illustrate this argument with examples drawn from our studies of two East African pastoral populations and discuss the relationship of response diversity to characteristics of social-ecological systems that can promote or diminish resilience.

Keywords: Africa; human ecology; pastoralists; resilience; social-ecological systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
TLUs by Total Acreage Cultivated for Households in Four Simanjiro Villages
Figure 2
Figure 2
Alternative spatial distributions of a given total amount of disturbed or transformed land.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Expected influence of intensity of land use on biodiversity, for different levels of use diversity.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Expected influence of spatial clustering of land use types on biodiversity, for different levels of land use saturation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adger WN. Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in Human Geography. 2000;24(3):347–364.
    1. Adger WN. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change. 2006;16:268–281.
    1. Baird TD. PhD dissertation in Geography. University of North Carolina; Chapel Hill: 2012. Development, Diversification, and Social Networks near Tarangire national Park, Northern Tanzania.
    1. Baird TD, Leslie PW, McCabe JT. The effect of wildlife conservation on local perceptions of risk and behavioral response. Human Ecology. 2009;37(4):463–474.
    1. Bardhan P, Dayton-Johnson J. Unequal irrigators: heterogeneity and commons management in large-scale multivariate research. In: Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolsak N, Stern PC, Stonich S, Weber EU, editors. The Drama of the Commons. National Academy Press; Washington, DC: 2002. pp. 87–112.

LinkOut - more resources