Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 8:8:15-25.
doi: 10.4137/EHI.S10869. eCollection 2014.

A framework for building research partnerships with first nations communities

Affiliations

A framework for building research partnerships with first nations communities

Lalita Bharadwaj. Environ Health Insights. .

Abstract

Solutions to complex health and environmental issues experienced by First Nations communities in Canada require the adoption of collaborative modes of research. The traditional "helicopter" approach to research applied in communities has led to disenchantment on the part of First Nations people and has impeded their willingness to participate in research. University researchers have tended to develop projects without community input and to adopt short term approaches to the entire process, perhaps a reflection of granting and publication cycles and other realities of academia. Researchers often enter communities, collect data without respect for local culture, and then exit, having had little or no community interaction or consideration of how results generated could benefit communities or lead to sustainable solutions. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has emerged as an alternative to the helicopter approach and is promoted here as a method to research that will meet the objectives of both First Nations and research communities. CBPR is a collaborative approach that equitably involves all partners in the research process. Although the benefits of CBPR have been recognized by segments of the University research community, there exists a need for comprehensive changes in approaches to First Nations centered research, and additional guidance to researchers on how to establish respectful and productive partnerships with First Nations communities beyond a single funded research project. This article provides a brief overview of ethical guidelines developed for researchers planning studies involving Aboriginal people as well as the historical context and principles of CBPR. A framework for building research partnerships with First Nations communities that incorporates and builds upon the guidelines and principles of CBPR is then presented. The framework was based on 10 years' experience working with First Nations communities in Saskatchewan. The framework for research partnership is composed of five phases. They are categorized as the pre-research, community consultation, community entry, research and research dissemination phases. These phases are cyclical, non-linear and interconnected. Elements of, and opportunities for, exploration, discussion, engagement, consultation, relationship building, partnership development, community involvement, and information sharing are key components of the five phases within the framework. The phases and elements within this proposed framework have been utilized to build and implement sustainable collaborative environmental health research projects with Saskatchewan First Nations communities.

Keywords: Saskatchewan first nations; community-based participatory research; consultation; engagement; ethical partnership; framework.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The First Nations centered research framework. The framework consists of five phases. These are represented in the light blue circle and can be read in a clockwise direction starting with the pre-research phase. The framework is centered and built upon key elements of discussion, consultation, engagement, co-learning, collaboration and communication which are depicted in red font and encompass the phases of the framework.

References

    1. Deloria V. God is Red: A Native View of Religion. Golden, CO: North American Press; 1992.
    1. Burhansstipanov L. Developing culturally competent community-based interventions. In: Weiner D, editor. Cancer Research Interventions Among the Medically Underserved. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing; 1999. pp. 167–83.
    1. Schnarch B. Ownership, control access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: a critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations Communities. J Aborig Health. 2004;1:80–95.
    1. Macaulay AC. Ethics of research in native communities. Can Fam Physician. 1994;40:1888–97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferreira M, Gendron F. Community-based participatory research with traditional and indigenous communities of the Americas: historical context and future directions. Int J Crit Psychol. 2011;3(3):153–68.

LinkOut - more resources