[Clinical application of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in initial treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome]
- PMID: 24856992
[Clinical application of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in initial treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome]
Abstract
Objective: To study the clinical effectiveness and safety of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in the initial treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) and the initial setting of NIPPV parameters.
Methods: One hundred neonates with NRDS were divided into NIPPV group (n=50) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) group (n=50). A randomized controlled study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of NIPPV versus NCPAP in the initial treatment of NRDS from the following aspects: reducing CO2 retention, improving oxygenation, reducing second endotracheal intubation and second use of pulmonary surfactant (PS), reducing the duration of invasive respiratory support, reducing the duration of oxygen use, and reducing the incidence of air leak, abdominal distension and ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Results: After 1 and 6 hours of noninvasive respiratory support, the NIPPV group was superior to the NCPAP group with respect to the reduction in CO2 retention and improvement in oxygenation (P<0.05); in addition, compared with the NCPAP group, the NIPPV group had significantly lower rates of second endotracheal intubation and second PS use, significantly shorter duration of invasive respiratory support and time of FiO2 >0.21, and significantly lower incidence of apnea and ventilator-associated pneumonia (P<0.05); there were no significant differences in the incidence of air leak and abdominal distention between the two groups.
Conclusions: NIPPV is effective and safe in the initial treatment of NRDS and holds promise for clinical application.
Similar articles
-
[A randomized controlled study of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome].Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;15(9):713-7. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 24034910 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
A prospective, randomized, controlled study of NIPPV versus nCPAP in preterm and term infants with respiratory distress syndrome.Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014 Jul;49(7):673-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22883. Epub 2013 Sep 4. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014. PMID: 24039148 Clinical Trial.
-
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial.J Perinatol. 2012 May;32(5):336-43. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.1. Epub 2012 Feb 2. J Perinatol. 2012. PMID: 22301528 Clinical Trial.
-
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis and up-date.Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Apr;50(4):402-9. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23130. Epub 2014 Nov 21. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015. PMID: 25418007 Review.
-
Nasal respiratory support through the nares: its time has come.J Perinatol. 2010 Oct;30 Suppl:S67-72. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.99. J Perinatol. 2010. PMID: 20877411 Review.
Cited by
-
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 27;7(7):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37497794 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 15;12(12):CD005384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005384.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 19;7:CD005384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005384.pub3. PMID: 27976361 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants as primary mode: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD014895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014895.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40590276 Review.
-
Comparative effectiveness of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation vs continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with RDS: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 28;184(7):455. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06282-7. Eur J Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 40579569 Review.
-
Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 19;7(7):CD005384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005384.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37466143 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources