Arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent shoulder instability with moderate glenoid bone defect in patients with moderate to low functional demand
- PMID: 24857422
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.03.023
Arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent shoulder instability with moderate glenoid bone defect in patients with moderate to low functional demand
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the functional outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent shoulder instability in the setting of moderate glenoid bone defect ranging from 20% to 30% in patients with moderate to low functional demand.
Methods: This study included 36 patients with unilateral recurrent instability and glenoid bone defects of 20% to 30% treated with arthroscopic stabilization. Glenoid bone loss was estimated on the en-face view of preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography. Joint laxity was assessed clinically by use of the Beighton and Horan criteria, and patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence of excessive joint laxity, group L (n = 13), or absence of excessive joint laxity, group N (n = 23). Functional assessments were performed with the patient-reported activity level; subjective shoulder value; Rowe score; and University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score.
Results: The mean glenoid defect size was 25.1% (range, 20% to 29%), and the overall functional outcomes improved significantly after surgery. A return to greater than 90% of the premorbid activity level was reported by 72% of patients (26 of 36 patients), and patient satisfaction was 83% (30 of 36 patients). There was no significant difference in functional outcomes between groups L and N (subjective shoulder value, 85.0% for group L v 88.9% for group N, P = .397; Rowe score, 83.5 for group L v 92.8 for group N, P = .537; and University of California, Los Angeles shoulder score, 32.2 for group L v 31.9 for group N, P = .697). Recurrent instability occurred in 4 patients (11%), 3 patients in group L (3 of 13, 23%) and 1 patient in group N (1 of 23, 4%), but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .125).
Conclusions: Arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent shoulder instability in patients with moderate to low functional demand produced satisfactory outcomes despite the presence of moderate glenoid bone defects of 20% to 30%. For patients with excessive joint laxity, however, arthroscopic stabilization may not be reliable, with a recurrence rate of 23%.
Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2014 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Atypical traumatic anterior shoulder instability with excessive joint laxity: recurrent shoulder subluxation without a history of dislocation.J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Apr 11;13(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0791-4. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018. PMID: 29642925 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes and Recurrence Rates After Arthroscopic Stabilization Procedures in Young Patients With a Glenoid Bone Erosion: A Comparative Study Between Glenoid Erosion More and Less Than 20.Arthroscopy. 2018 Aug;34(8):2287-2293. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 May 24. Arthroscopy. 2018. PMID: 29804952
-
Association Between Excessive Joint Laxity and a Wider Hill-Sachs Lesion in Anterior Shoulder Instability.Am J Sports Med. 2021 Dec;49(14):3981-3987. doi: 10.1177/03635465211049221. Epub 2021 Oct 25. Am J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 34694163
-
Glenoid Bone Loss in Recurrent Shoulder Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Systematic Review.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Nov 15;105(22):1815-1821. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00388. Epub 2023 Aug 29. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023. PMID: 37643239
-
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage in Comparison to Bone Block Augmentation for Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bipolar Bone Loss: A Systematic Review.Arthroscopy. 2021 Feb;37(2):706-717. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.08.033. Epub 2020 Sep 7. Arthroscopy. 2021. PMID: 32911004
Cited by
-
Current concepts in the management of recurrent anterior gleno-humeral joint instability with bone loss.World J Orthop. 2016 Jun 18;7(6):343-54. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i6.343. eCollection 2016 Jun 18. World J Orthop. 2016. PMID: 27335809 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of Glenoid and Humeral Bone Defects on Recurrent Anterior Instability of the Shoulder.Clin Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(2):145-150. doi: 10.4055/cios19060. Epub 2020 May 14. Clin Orthop Surg. 2020. PMID: 32489534 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes of arthroscopic capsulolabral reconstruction for anterior instability with greater than 20% glenoid bone defects: are Latarjet procedures absolutely indicated for these patients?Clin Shoulder Elb. 2020 May 25;23(2):62-70. doi: 10.5397/cise.2019.00094. eCollection 2020 Jun. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2020. PMID: 33330236 Free PMC article.
-
Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation combined with capsulolabral reconstruction is safe and reliable.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Dec;27(12):3997-4004. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05648-3. Epub 2019 Aug 3. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019. PMID: 31377825
-
High Variability of the Definition of Recurrent Glenohumeral Instability: An Analysis of the Current Literature by a Systematic Review.Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr 6;3(3):e951-e966. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.02.002. eCollection 2021 Jun. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 34195665 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials