Bad science, sloppy reporting, and retracted publications: should peer review be the scapegoat?

Editorial

Sandra P Thomas. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2014 Jun.

. 2014 Jun;35(6):411-2.

doi: 10.3109/01612840.2014.907685.

No abstract available

Comment on

Research on peer review and biomedical publication: furthering the quest to improve the quality of reporting.
Rennie D, Flanagin A. Rennie D, et al. JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1019-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1362. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 24618962 No abstract available.

Research on peer review and biomedical publication: furthering the quest to improve the quality of reporting.
Rennie D, Flanagin A. Rennie D, et al. JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1019-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1362. JAMA. 2014. PMID: 24618962 No abstract available.
Control of data, authorship, and responsibility for clinical trials publications.
Freeman WR. Freeman WR. Ophthalmology. 2005 Sep;112(9):1485-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.04.007. Ophthalmology. 2005. PMID: 16139664 No abstract available.
Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability.
Wilkes MS; International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Wilkes MS, et al. West J Med. 2001 Oct;175(4):259. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.175.4.259. West J Med. 2001. PMID: 11577056 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Industry sponsorship and authorship of clinical trials over 20 years.
Buchkowsky SS, Jewesson PJ. Buchkowsky SS, et al. Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Apr;38(4):579-85. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D267. Epub 2004 Feb 24. Ann Pharmacother. 2004. PMID: 14982982 Review.
Retrospective cohort study highlighted outcome reporting bias in UK publicly funded trials.
Matthews GA, Dumville JC, Hewitt CE, Torgerson DJ. Matthews GA, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Sep 1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21889307 Review.