Urotrauma: AUA guideline
- PMID: 24857651
- PMCID: PMC4104146
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.004
Urotrauma: AUA guideline
Abstract
Purpose: The authors of this guideline reviewed the urologic trauma literature to guide clinicians in the appropriate methods of evaluation and management of genitourinary injuries.
Materials and methods: A systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE® and EMBASE databases (search dates 1/1/90-9/19/12) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed publications relevant to urotrauma. The review yielded an evidence base of 372 studies after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. These publications were used to inform the statements presented in the guideline as Standards, Recommendations or Options. When sufficient evidence existed, the body of evidence for a particular treatment was assigned a strength rating of A (high), B (moderate) or C (low). In the absence of sufficient evidence, additional information is provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions.
Results: Guideline statements were created to inform clinicians on the initial observation, evaluation and subsequent management of renal, ureteral, bladder, urethral and genital traumatic injuries.
Conclusions: Genitourinary organ salvage has become increasingly possible as a result of advances in imaging, minimally invasive techniques, and reconstructive surgery. As the field of genitourinary reconstruction continues to evolve, clinicians must strive to approach clinical problems in a creative, multidisciplinary, evidence-based manner to ensure optimal outcomes.
Keywords: injury; urotrauma.
Copyright © 2014 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Urotrauma guidelines.J Urol. 2014 Aug;192(2):336. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 May 20. J Urol. 2014. PMID: 24857649 No abstract available.
-
Surgery: Treating urotrauma--new guidelines to aid decisions.Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Sep;11(9):495-6. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.202. Epub 2014 Aug 12. Nat Rev Urol. 2014. PMID: 25112858 No abstract available.
-
Re: Urotrauma: AUA guideline.J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):1065-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.121. Epub 2014 Dec 1. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25476111 No abstract available.
References
-
- Higgins JDA. Assessing quality of included studies in Cochrane Reviews. The Cochrane Collaboration Methods Groups Newsletter. Vol 112007
-
- Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529. - PubMed
-
- Norris SL, Lee NJ, Severance S, et al. Drug Class Review: Newer Drugs for the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: Final Report. Oregon Health & Science University; Portland: 2008. Appendix B. Quality assessment methods for drug class reviews for the drug effectiveness review project. - PubMed
-
- Faraday M, Hubbard H, Kosiak B, et al. Staying at the cutting edge: a review and analysis of evidence reporting and grading; the recommendations of the American Urological Association. BJU Int. 2009;104:294. - PubMed
-
- Hsu C, Sandford BA. The Delphi Technique: Making Sense Of Consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. 2007;12:1.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials