Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug;196(15):2876-88.
doi: 10.1128/JB.01530-14. Epub 2014 May 23.

Influence of the AgrC-AgrA complex on the response time of Staphylococcus aureus quorum sensing

Affiliations

Influence of the AgrC-AgrA complex on the response time of Staphylococcus aureus quorum sensing

Sandeep K Srivastava et al. J Bacteriol. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

The Staphylococcus aureus agr quorum-sensing system plays a major role in the transition from the persistent to the virulent phenotype. S. aureus agr type I to IV strains are characterized by mutations in the sensor domain of the histidine kinase AgrC and differences in the sequences of the secreted autoinducing peptides (AIP). Here we demonstrate that interactions between the cytosolic domain of AgrC (AgrCCyto) and the response regulator domain of AgrA (AgrARR) dictate the spontaneity of the cellular response to AIP stimuli. The crystal structure of AgrCCyto provided a basis for a mechanistic model of AgrC-AgrA interactions. This model enabled an analysis of the biochemical and biophysical parameters of AgrC-AgrA interactions in the context of the conformational features of the AgrC-AgrA complex. This analysis revealed distinct sequence and conformational features that determine the affinity, specificity, and kinetics of the phosphotransfer reaction. This step, which governs the response time for transcriptional reengineering triggered by an AIP stimulus, is independent of the agr type and similar for agonist and antagonist stimuli. These experimental data could serve as a basis on which to validate simulations of the quorum-sensing response and for strategies that employ the agr quorum-sensing system to combat biofilm formation in S. aureus infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Conformational features of AgrC. (A) The ATP binding domain in the crystal structure of AgrC (PDB code 4BXI). Residues 389 to 393 could not be modeled in the electron density map (shown by a discontinuous line). (B) Structural superimposition of the ATP binding domain of AgrC and a representative ligand-bound ATP binding domain (TM0853; PDB code 2C2A; in gray). The lid of the ATP binding site adopts a conformation in AgrC that is different from that in other characterized domain structures in the apo- and ATP-bound forms. (C) AgrC sequence conservation across staphylococci. For this representation of sequence conservation on a structural model, the transmembrane segment of AgrC (residues 1 to 206) was modeled by using Acetabularia acetabulum rhodopsin AR2 (PDB code 3AM6) as a template in the LOMETS program (51). Mutations in the seventh transmembrane helix (inset) result in loss of specificity to self-activating peptides (3). The dimerization domain (residues 206 to 278) was modeled on the basis of T. maritima HK853 (PDB code 3DGE) by using the Phyre server (56). This figure was generated with ConSurf (52).
FIG 2
FIG 2
Kinetic parameters of phosphorylation and phosphotransfer. (A) The time course reaction used to calculate the initial rates of AgrCCyto∼P formation at different ATP concentrations. (B) Reaction velocity-versus-[ATP] curve for AgrC autophosphorylation. The kinetic parameters of this reaction are reported in the text. (C) Data used to calculate the kinetic parameters of the phosphotransfer reaction between AgrCCyto and AgrAFL. (D) Comparison of phosphotransfer to AgrARR and phosphotransfer to AgrAFL. The error bars represent standard deviations of five independent measurements.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Phosphorylation influences AgrCCyto-AgrA interactions. (A) Model of AgrCCyto-AgrARR interaction. The interacting residues in AgrCCyto and AgrA are shown in more detail in Fig. SA3, SA4, and SA5 in the supplemental material. (B) SPR spectroscopy experiments were performed by immobilizing AgrAFL on a CM5 chip. Different concentrations of AgrCCyto were used as analytes. (C) AgrCCyto-AgrAFL interactions in the presence of 2 mM ATP. (D) To quantify AgrC-AgrA interactions, Tyr-251 at the interface of AgrC and AgrA (inset highlighted in panel A) of AgrCCyto was mutated to a tryptophan residue. The emission spectrum (300 to 400 nm) of AgrCCytoY251W (5 μM) suggests that the tryptophan fluorescence is sensitive to the conformation of AgrCCyto. (E) To monitor the interaction of AgrC with AgrA, 4 μM AgrCCytoY251W was titrated with increasing concentrations of AgrAFL (0 to 80 μM) and fluorescence emission at 344 nm was monitored (estimated Kd, 20.62 ± 2.98 μM). (F) ATP influences AgrCCyto-AgrA interactions. Fluorescence titration in the presence of 2 mM ATP resulted in a Kd of 9.02 ± 2.0 μM (error bars represent standard deviations; n = 6).
FIG 4
FIG 4
Quaternary association of AgrAFL. (A) Phosphorylated AgrAFL is a dimer in solution. Shown is the size exclusion profile of AgrAFL on a Superdex 200-10/300GL column (GE Healthcare) (calibration shown in the inset). Phosphorylated AgrA was obtained by incubating this protein in 10 mM acetyl phosphate. (B) DLS measurements performed at different concentrations (0.3 to 2.0 μM) of AgrAFL in the presence or absence of acetyl phosphate are consistent with the size exclusion results. The error bars represent the standard deviations of three measurements with different protein preparations.
FIG 5
FIG 5
(A) Effects of agonistic stimuli on the transcriptional levels of genes in the agr regulon. S. aureus clinical isolate 1437 (agr type II) was grown at 37°C in TSB, and cells were harvested at 3, 5, and 7 h. The mRNA levels of genes in the Agr regulon (agrA, agrC, RNAIII, hla [α-hemolysin], and spa [surface protein A]) were quantified. The error bars represent standard deviations of triplicates, and fold changes in expression are on a log scale. The inset shows the immunoprecipitation of AgrA from S. aureus cell lysates at different time points. Freshly purified recombinant AgrA was used as the control. (B) Effect of antagonistic stimuli on the transcriptional levels of genes in the agr regulon. The expression of agrA, agrC, RNAIII, hla, and spa was monitored after cells were subjected to antagonistic stimuli. In this representative illustration, clinical isolate 1437 (agr type II) was grown until the early exponential phase (3 h). Supernatants from S. aureus 559 (agr type I), 1039 (agr type III), and 368 (agr type IV) were added to the cultures, and they were grown further before the isolation of cells at 5 and 7 h. For clarity, the agr types are represented as I, II, III, and IV. (C) Effects of antagonistic stimuli on hemolysis. S. aureus strain 1437 was streaked onto 5% blood agar plates containing AIPs of other agr types. The clearance zones provide a measure of hemolysis. The effect of AIPs on hemolysis was visually monitored by comparison with blood agar plates without AIPs. These findings on the effects of agonist and antagonist stimuli were consistent across all of the clinical strains examined in this study (see Fig. SA17 in the supplemental material).
FIG 6
FIG 6
Schematic representation of the stages of the S. aureus agr quorum-sensing mechanism. This compilation, including the definition of steps I to V, is based on previous reports (8, 37, 53, 54). The focus of this study (inner dotted circle) is the intracellular signal transduction step regulated by the AgrCCyto-AgrA complex. The binding affinity for the AgrCCyto-AgrA interactions (including the effect of phosphorylation), as well as the enzyme kinetic parameters, rationalizes the spontaneity in triggering an intracellular response to an AIP stimulus. The signal amplification (larger circle) is slower, with a time frame of ca. 5 h. It is at this stage where the effect of the stability of RNAIII (half-life, >45 min [55]) is likely to be important. Our data (Fig. 5) suggest a linear AgrA concentration increase at both the mRNA and protein levels. This finding supports a mathematical model placing AgrA expression in a leading position before that of other genes in the agr regulon.

References

    1. Lowy FD. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 339:520–532. 10.1056/NEJM199808203390806 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Novick RP. 2003. Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48:1429–1449. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03526.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geisinger E, Muir TW, Novick RP. 2009. agr receptor mutants reveal distinct modes of inhibition by staphylococcal autoinducing peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106:1216–1221. 10.1073/pnas.0807760106 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boisset S, Geissmann T, Huntzinger E, Fechter P, Bendridi N, Possedko M, Chevalier C, Helfer AC, Benito Y, Jacquier A, Gaspin C, Vandenesch F, Romby P. 2007. Staphylococcus aureus RNAIII coordinately represses the synthesis of virulence factors and the transcription regulator Rot by an antisense mechanism. Genes Dev. 21:1353–1366. 10.1101/gad.423507 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang R, Braughton KR, Kretschmer D, Bach TH, Queck SY, Li M, Kennedy AD, Dorward DW, Klebanoff SJ, Peschel A, DeLeo FR, Otto M. 2007. Identification of novel cytolytic peptides as key virulence determinants for community-associated MRSA. Nat. Med. 13:1510–1514. 10.1038/nm1656 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources