Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;25(2):930-47.
doi: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0107.

Mission, margin, and the role of consumer governance in decision-making at community health centers

Brad Wright, Graham P Martin

Mission, margin, and the role of consumer governance in decision-making at community health centers

Brad Wright et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2014 May.

Abstract

Objective: We explore the role of consumer trustees in decision-making as community health centers (CHCs) work to navigate the tension between pursuing their mission to provide primary care to all regardless of ability to pay and maintaining their limited finances.

Methods: We interviewed 30 trustees from 16 CHCs in 14 different states, asking extensively about decision-making processes at their CHC related to services and finances, as well as perceived advantages and disadvantages of consumer governance.

Results: Respondents described mission-dominant, margin-dominant, and balanced decision-making philosophies, and different decision-making pathways for service provision and finances. Consumer trustees were lauded for their role in informing the board of service quality and community needs, but criticized for being professionally unskilled and exhibiting a lack of objective decision-making.

Conclusions: While CHC boards do play a role in navigating the tension between mission and margin, executive directors and staff appear to be more influential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moynihan DP. Maximum feasible misunderstanding: community action in the war on poverty. New York: Free Press; 1969.
    1. Levitan SA. The community action program: a strategy to fight poverty. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1969;385(1):63–75.
    1. Rubin LB. Maximum feasible participation: the origins, implications, and present status. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1969;385(1):14–29.
    1. Sundquist JL. The end of the experiment? In: Sundquist JL, editor. On fighting poverty. New York: Basic Books; 1969.
    1. Greenstone JD, Peterson PE. Race and authority in urban politics: community participation and the war on poverty. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1973.

LinkOut - more resources