A characterization of clinical questions asked by rehabilitation therapists
- PMID: 24860260
- PMCID: PMC3988776
- DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.002
A characterization of clinical questions asked by rehabilitation therapists
Abstract
Objective: This study explored the information needs of rehabilitation therapists (occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists) working with patients who have had strokes in order to characterize their clinical questions, defined as their formalized information needs arising in the context of everyday clinical practice.
Methods: The researchers took a constructivist, interpretive approach, in which fifteen rehabilitation therapists working in various settings were recruited. Data were gathered using diaries, followed by diary-guided interviews, and thematically analyzed using template analysis.
Results: Rehabilitation therapists' clinical questions were characterized as having one or more of twelve foci and containing one or more of eight possible structural elements.
Conclusions: Findings demonstrate that the evidence-based practice framework currently applied for questions relating to rehabilitation is inadequate for representing rehabilitation therapists' clinical questions. A new framework that is more comprehensive and descriptive is proposed.
Implications: Librarians working with students and clinicians in rehabilitation can employ knowledge of the twelve foci and the question structure for rehabilitation to guide the reference interview. Instruction on question formulation in evidence-based practice can employ the revised structure for rehabilitation, offering students and clinicians an alternative to the traditional patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) structure. Information products, including bibliographic databases and synopsis services, can tailor their interfaces according to question foci and prompt users to enter search terms corresponding to any of the eight possible elements found in rehabilitation therapists' clinical questions.
Similar articles
-
Clinical information behavior of rehabilitation therapists: a review of the research on occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists.J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jul;97(3):194-202. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.008. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009. PMID: 19626145 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exploring factors influencing occupational therapists' perception of patients' rehabilitation potential after acquired brain injury.Aust Occup Ther J. 2017 Apr;64(2):149-158. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12327. Epub 2016 Sep 21. Aust Occup Ther J. 2017. PMID: 27654022
-
Physical therapists' experiences updating the clinical management of walking rehabilitation after stroke: a qualitative study.Phys Ther. 2009 Jun;89(6):556-68. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080249. Epub 2009 Apr 16. Phys Ther. 2009. PMID: 19372171
-
Understanding allied health practitioners' use of evidence-based assessments for children with cerebral palsy: a mixed methods study.Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jan;41(1):53-65. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1373376. Epub 2017 Sep 6. Disabil Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 28877650
-
Counselling training for speech-language therapists working with people affected by post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review.Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 May;54(3):321-346. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12455. Epub 2019 Feb 13. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019. PMID: 30758112
Cited by
-
Systematic Literature Review on ICF From 2001 to 2013 in the Nordic Countries Focusing on Clinical and Rehabilitation Context.J Clin Med Res. 2016 Jan;8(1):1-9. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2400w. Epub 2015 Dec 3. J Clin Med Res. 2016. PMID: 26668676 Free PMC article. Review.
-
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in Vocational Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review of the State of the Field.J Occup Rehabil. 2019 Jun;29(2):241-273. doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9788-4. J Occup Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 29869054 Free PMC article.
-
Physiotherapists' Use of Web-Based Information Resources to Fulfill Their Information Needs During a Theoretical Examination: Randomized Crossover Trial.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 17;22(12):e19747. doi: 10.2196/19747. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 33331826 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluating the impact of clinical librarians on clinical questions during inpatient rounds.J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Apr;106(2):175-183. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.254. Epub 2018 Apr 1. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29632440 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical informationist participation in grand round sessions of gastroenterology department: An action research study.J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Aug 31;10:300. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_576_20. eCollection 2021. J Educ Health Promot. 2021. PMID: 34667800 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kronenfeld M, Stephenson PL, Nail-Chiwetalu B, Tweed EM, Sauers EL, McLeod TCV, Guo R, Trahan H, Alpi KM, Hill B, Sherwill-Navarro P, Allen MP, Hartman LM, Burnham J, Fell D, Pavlick R, MacNaughton EW, Ratner NB. Review for librarians of evidence-based practice in nursing and the allied health professions in the United States. J Med Lib Assoc. 2007 Oct;95(4):394–407. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.95.4.394. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Pettigrew KE, Fidel R, Bruce H. Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol. 2001;35:43–78.
-
- Case DO. Looking for information: a survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. 3rd ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald; 2012.
-
- Davies KS, Harrison J. The information-seeking behaviour of doctors: a review of the evidence. Health Inf Lib J. 2007 Jun;24(2):78–94. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources