Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul;28(5):741-68.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 4.

Imaging techniques for the evaluation of cervical cancer

Affiliations
Review

Imaging techniques for the evaluation of cervical cancer

Antonia Carla Testa et al. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Improvements in the treatment of cervical carcinoma have made it possible to offer optimal and personalised treatment. Cervical cancer staging is based on clinical examination and histological findings. Many diagnostic methods are used in clinical practice. Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the optimal method for staging cervical carcinoma because of its high accuracy in assessing local extension of disease and distant metastases. Ultrasound has gained increased attention in recent years; it is faster, cheaper, and more widely available than other imaging techniques, and is highly accurate in detecting tumour presence and evaluating local extension of disease. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound are often used together with computed tomography or positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography to assess the whole body, a more accurate detection of pathological lymph nodes and metabolic information of the disease.

Keywords: cervical cancer staging; computed tomography; diagnostic methods; magnetic resonance imaging; positron emission tomography; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer