Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;174(7):1085-92.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1183.

Stability of end-of-life preferences: a systematic review of the evidence

Catherine L Auriemma  1 , Christina A Nguyen  2 , Rachel Bronheim  3 , Saida Kent  4 , Shrivatsa Nadiger  5 , Dustin Pardo  6 , Scott D Halpern  7
Affiliations

Stability of end-of-life preferences: a systematic review of the evidence

Catherine L Auriemma et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Importance: Policies and practices that promote advance care planning and advance directive completion implicitly assume that patients' choices for end-of-life (EOL) care are stable over time, even with changes in health status.

Objective: To systematically evaluate the evidence on the stability of EOL preferences over time and with changes in health status.

Evidence review: We searched for longitudinal studies of patients' preferences for EOL care in PubMed, EMBASE, and using citation review. Studies restricted to preferences regarding the place of care at the EOL were excluded.

Findings: A total of 296 articles were assessed for eligibility, and 59 met inclusion criteria. Twenty-four articles had sufficient data to extract or calculate the percentage of individuals with stable preferences or the percentage of total preferences that were stable over time. In 17 studies (71%) more than 70% of patients' preferences for EOL care were stable over time. Preference stability was generally greater among inpatients and seriously ill outpatients than among older adults without serious illnesses (P < .002). Patients with higher education and who had engaged in advance care planning had greater preference stability, and preferences to forgo therapies were generally more stable than preferences to receive therapies. Among 9 of the 24 studies (38%) assessing changes in health status, no consistent relationship with preference changes was identified.

Conclusions and relevance: Considerable variability among studies in the methods of preference assessment, the time between assessments, and the definitions of stability preclude meta-analytic estimates of the stability of patients' preferences and the factors influencing these preferences. Although more seriously ill patients and those who engage in advance care planning most commonly have stable preferences for future treatments, further research in real-world settings is needed to confirm the utility of advance care plans for future decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow of Studies Through the Review Process
The flow of studies through the identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion process modeled after the PRISMA flow diagram. aThe remaining 31 studies did not contain sufficient data to extract or calculate the percentage of individuals with stable preferences for specific treatments or the percentage of total stable preferences over time.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Percentage of Patients With Stable Preferences by Severity of Illness
Studies were grouped into 3 categories based on the severity of illness of the source population: inpatients, outpatients, and older adults. Bubble size reflects the sample size of the study. Bubble color represents the source population. The diamonds represent a summary measure for each of the 3 groups. (The remaining 31 studies did not contain sufficient data to extract or calculate the percentage of individuals with stable preferences for specific treatment or the percentage of total stable preferences over time.)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Silveira MJ, Kim SY. Langa KM. Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(13): 1211–1218. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gomes B Calanzani N, Gysels M, Hall S, Higginson IJ. Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care.2013.−12:7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R. Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2) :377–381. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ditto PH, Smucker WD, Danks JH, et al. Stability of older adults’ preferences for life-sustaining medical treatment. Health Psychol. 2003;22(6): 605–615. - PubMed
    1. Houts RM. Smucker WD, Jacobson JA. Ditto PH. Danks JH. Predicting elderly outpatients’ life-sustaining treatment preferences over time: the majority rules. Med Decis Making. 2002;22(1):39–52. - PubMed

Publication types