Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 17;160(12):813-20.
doi: 10.7326/M14-0500.

What are cancer centers advertising to the public?: a content analysis

Laura B Vater, Julie M Donohue, Robert Arnold, Douglas B White, Edward Chu, Yael Schenker

What are cancer centers advertising to the public?: a content analysis

Laura B Vater et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Although critics have expressed concerns about cancer center advertising, analyses of the content of these advertisements are lacking.

Objective: To characterize the informational and emotional content of direct-to-consumer cancer center advertisements.

Design: Content analysis.

Setting: Top U.S. consumer magazines (n = 269) and television networks (n = 44) in 2012.

Measurements: Types of clinical services promoted; information provided about clinical services, including risks, benefits, costs, and insurance availability; use of emotional advertising appeals; and use of patient testimonials were assessed. Two investigators independently coded advertisements using ATLAS.ti, and κ values ranged from 0.77 to 1.00.

Results: A total of 102 cancer centers placed 409 unique clinical advertisements in top media markets in 2012. Advertisements promoted treatments (88%) more often than screening (18%) or supportive services (13%). Benefits of advertised therapies were described more often than risks (27% vs. 2%) but were rarely quantified (2%). Few advertisements mentioned coverage or costs (5%), and none mentioned specific insurance plans. Emotional appeals were frequent (85%), evoking hope for survival (61%), describing cancer treatment as a fight or battle (41%), and inducing fear (30%). Nearly one half of advertisements included patient testimonials, which were usually focused on survival, rarely included disclaimers (15%), and never described the results that a typical patient may expect.

Limitation: Internet advertisements were not included.

Conclusion: Clinical advertisements by cancer centers frequently promote cancer therapy with emotional appeals that evoke hope and fear while rarely providing information about risks, benefits, costs, or insurance availability. Further work is needed to understand how these advertisements influence patient understanding and expectations of benefit from cancer treatments.

Primary funding source: National Institutes of Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results of cancer center advertisement search
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of 409 advertisements promoting clinical services that mention benefits, risks, indications, alternatives, and costs
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. National Research Council. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. - PubMed
    1. Warren JL, Yabroff KR, Meekins A, Topor M, Lamont EB, Brown ML. Evaluation of trends in the cost of initial cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:888–897. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:117–128. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American College of Surgeons [internet] [cited 2014 Jan 29];About Accreditation. updated 2013 Feb 27; Available from: http://www.facs.org/cancer/coc/whatis.html.
    1. Newman AA. A Healing Touch From Hospitals. The New York Times; 2011. Sep 13, Sect. B: 2.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources