What matters most? The content and concordance of patients' and providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making
- PMID: 24863169
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.012
What matters most? The content and concordance of patients' and providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making
Abstract
Objective(s): The objective of this study was to identify women's and health care providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making and counseling, respectively.
Study design: Cross-sectional surveys were administered online to convenience samples of 417 women and 188 contraceptive care providers residing in the United States. Participants were provided with a list of 34 questions related to the features of contraceptive options and rated the importance of each. Participants also ranked the questions in descending order of importance. For both women and providers, we calculated the mean importance rating for each question and the proportion that ranked each question in their three most important questions.
Results: The average importance ratings given by women and providers were similar for 18 questions, but dissimilar for the remaining 16 questions. The question rated most important for women was "How does it work to prevent pregnancy?" whereas, for providers, "How often does a patient need to remember to use it?" and "How is it used?" were rated equally. The eight questions most frequently selected in the top three by women and/or providers were related to the safety of the method, mechanism of action, mode of use, side effects, typical- and perfect-use effectiveness, frequency of administration and when it begins to prevent pregnancy.
Conclusion(s): Although we found considerable concordance between women's and provider's information priorities, the presence of some inconsistencies highlights the importance of patient-centered contraceptive counseling and, in particular, shared contraceptive decision making.
Implications: This study provides insights into the information priorities of women for their contraceptive decision making and health care providers for contraceptive counseling. These insights are critical both to inform the development of decision support tools for implementation in contraceptive care and to guide the delivery of patient-centered care.
Keywords: Contraception; Family planning; Needs assessment; Patient education; Patient-centered care; Shared decision making.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Informed choice in family planning: what do women want to know?Contraception. 2015 Mar;91(3):265. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 6. Contraception. 2015. PMID: 25261152 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Patient and provider perspectives on Bedsider.org, an online contraceptive information tool, in a low income, racially diverse clinic population.Contraception. 2014 Dec;90(6):588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Jul 25. Contraception. 2014. PMID: 25139723
-
Public and private providers' involvement in improving their patients' contraceptive use.Contraception. 2008 Jul;78(1):42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 May 29. Contraception. 2008. PMID: 18555817
-
The relationship between female adolescent self-esteem, decision making, and contraceptive behavior.J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 Nov;19(11):614-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00267.x. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007. PMID: 17970861
-
Contraceptive methods: do Hispanic adolescents and their family planning care providers think about contraceptive methods the same way?Med Anthropol. 1996 May;17(1):65-82. doi: 10.1080/01459740.1996.9966128. Med Anthropol. 1996. PMID: 8757713 Review.
-
What's Known and What's Next: Contraceptive Counseling and Support for Adolescents and Young Adult Women.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021 Aug;34(4):484-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.12.008. Epub 2020 Dec 15. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33333260 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of a computerized contraceptive decision aid: A randomized controlled trial.Contraception. 2020 Nov;102(5):339-345. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 6. Contraception. 2020. PMID: 32771369 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Provider Bias in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Promotion and Removal: Perceptions of Young Adult Women.Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):1932-1937. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303393. Epub 2016 Sep 15. Am J Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27631741 Free PMC article.
-
The role of contraceptive attributes in women's contraceptive decision making.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):46.e1-46.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.051. Epub 2015 Jan 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25644443 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Fertility Awareness-Based Methods for Pregnancy Prevention Among Ghanaian Women: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey.Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Jun 30;9(2):318-331. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00601. Print 2021 Jun 30. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021. PMID: 34234024 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge about the impact of age on fertility: a brief review.Ups J Med Sci. 2020 May;125(2):167-174. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2019.1707913. Epub 2020 Jan 22. Ups J Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 31964217 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical