Perceptuo-motor effects of response-distractor compatibility in speech: beyond phonemic identity
- PMID: 24865282
- DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0666-6
Perceptuo-motor effects of response-distractor compatibility in speech: beyond phonemic identity
Abstract
Previous studies have found faster response times in a production task when a speaker perceives a distractor syllable that is identical to the syllable they are required to produce. No study has found such effects when a response and a distractor are not identical but share parameters below the level of the phoneme. Results from Experiment 1 show some evidence of a response-time effect of response-distractor voicing congruency. Experiment 2 showed a robust effect of articulator congruency: perceiving a distractor that has the same articulatory organ as that implicated in the planned motor response speeds up response times. These results necessitate a more direct and specific formulation of the perception-production link than warranted by previous experimental evidence. Implications for theories of speech production are also discussed.
Similar articles
-
Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in vowels: Beyond phonemic identity.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jul;82(5):2751-2764. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02014-1. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020. PMID: 32236835 Free PMC article.
-
Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.Brain Res. 2010 Oct 1;1354:113-22. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.058. Epub 2010 Jul 30. Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20674555
-
Precision of voicing perceptual identification is altered in association with voice-onset time production changes.Exp Brain Res. 2019 Sep;237(9):2197-2204. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05584-1. Epub 2019 Jun 19. Exp Brain Res. 2019. PMID: 31218370
-
Phonological encoding in the oral but not manual Stroop task: Evidence for the role of a speech production process.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Aug;46(8):1494-1504. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000828. Epub 2020 Feb 27. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020. PMID: 32105148
-
Feature, phoneme, syllable or word: how is speech mentally represented?Phonetica. 1995;52(3):131-43. doi: 10.1159/000262128. Phonetica. 1995. PMID: 7568391 Review.
Cited by
-
Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in vowels: Beyond phonemic identity.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jul;82(5):2751-2764. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02014-1. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020. PMID: 32236835 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Jul;80(5):1290-1299. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1501-3. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018. PMID: 29536418 Free PMC article.
-
Automatic imitation of vocal actions is unaffected by group membership.Psychol Res. 2025 Mar 24;89(2):74. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02104-5. Psychol Res. 2025. PMID: 40126679 Free PMC article.
-
Computer simulations of coupled idiosyncrasies in speech perception and speech production with COSMO, a perceptuo-motor Bayesian model of speech communication.PLoS One. 2019 Jan 11;14(1):e0210302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210302. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30633745 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in the speech signal as a window into the cognitive architecture of language production.Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):1973-2004. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1423-4. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018. PMID: 29383571 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources