Metacognition as discrimination: commentary on Smith et al. (2014)
- PMID: 24866002
- PMCID: PMC4374550
- DOI: 10.1037/a0034412
Metacognition as discrimination: commentary on Smith et al. (2014)
Abstract
Smith, Couchman, and Beran (2014, pp. 115-131) critique recent "low-level" associative process models of nonhuman metacognition. We agree with many aspects of their critique. However, the alternative account they offer may not help specify the mechanisms of metacognition. We propose a middle-ground approach, based on the methods of comparative psychophysics, by which metacognition is treated as a discrimination problem.
©2014 APA, all rights reserved.
Comment on
-
Animal metacognition: a tale of two comparative psychologies.J Comp Psychol. 2014 May;128(2):115-31. doi: 10.1037/a0033105. Epub 2013 Aug 19. J Comp Psychol. 2014. PMID: 23957740 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Call J. Do apes know that they could be wrong? Anim Cogn. 2010;13:689–700. - PubMed
-
- Domjan M, Galef B. Biological constraints on instrumental and classical conditioning: Retrospect and prospect. Animal Learning & Behavior. 1983;11:151–161.
-
- Hampton RR. Can Rhesus monkeys discriminate between remembering and forgetting? In: Terrace HS, Metcalfe J, editors. The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness. Oxford University Press; New York: 2005. pp. 272–295.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
