Active surveillance and surgery in localized prostate cancer
- PMID: 24867314
Active surveillance and surgery in localized prostate cancer
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed non-cutaneous cancer and also the second leading cause of cancer deaths among men. Concerns about overdiagnosis and overtreatment of PCa have been growing, leading to more conservative approaches, especially in the treatment of low-risk disease. As PCa is a relatively slow-growing tumor, complications of unnecessary curative management in low-risk PCa can be prevented by active surveillance (AS). AS helps to improve quality of life after deferred treatment. Several AS criteria have been suggested for delayed treatment. Although upgrading and/or upstaging of cancer is a limitation of AS, many reports have shown low rates of cancer-specific mortality up to now. Radical prostatectomy (RP) has been considered as standard treatment for prostate cancer to provide good oncologic outcomes. The increasing use of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery, including robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, has contributed to better functional outcomes. So far, long-term randomized studies have not conclusively proven the superiority of either AS or RP. Well-designed long-term randomized studies will be required to compare the benefits of AS and immediate RP. Here, we review recent reports on the current status of AS and RP, including delayed RP, and discuss their merits in the management of localized PCa.
Similar articles
-
Changing Trends in Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer: The End of Overtreatment?Eur Urol. 2015 Aug;68(2):175-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Feb 27. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25736732
-
Management of localised prostate cancer: watchful waiting, surgery or radiation therapy, depending on the natural course, which is often relatively slow.Prescrire Int. 2012 Oct;21(131):242-8. Prescrire Int. 2012. PMID: 23185849 Review.
-
Pathological stage distribution in patients treated with radical prostatectomy reflecting the need for protocol-based active surveillance: results from a contemporary European patient cohort.BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(2):195-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10707.x. Epub 2011 Nov 17. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22093744
-
Immediate versus delayed radical prostatectomy: updated outcomes following active surveillance of prostate cancer.Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):458-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jun 29. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 26138041
-
Minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer.Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2012 Dec;64(4):245-53. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2012. PMID: 23288211 Review.
Cited by
-
The Effect of Evolving Strategies in the Surgical Management of Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Data from 2005 to 2014 in a Multicenter Setting.Adv Ther. 2017 Feb;34(2):576-585. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0469-4. Epub 2017 Jan 4. Adv Ther. 2017. PMID: 28054309 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Radical Prostatectomy: A Turkish Multicenter Study.Turk J Urol. 2022 Sep;48(5):339-345. doi: 10.5152/tud.2022.22130. Turk J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35950833 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of pathological upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients without hypointense lesions on an apparent diffusion coefficient map of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.World J Urol. 2016 Nov;34(11):1541-1546. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1829-z. Epub 2016 Apr 13. World J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27074937
-
Association and regulation of protein factors of field effect in prostate tissues.Int J Oncol. 2016 Oct;49(4):1541-1552. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3666. Epub 2016 Aug 22. Int J Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27634112 Free PMC article.
-
Functional outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance.World J Urol. 2018 Sep;36(9):1391-1397. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2298-3. Epub 2018 Apr 21. World J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29680952
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials