Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;133(6):748e-755e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000174.

The differential impact of plastic surgery subspecialties on the financial performance of an academic clinical practice

Affiliations

The differential impact of plastic surgery subspecialties on the financial performance of an academic clinical practice

Albert H Chao et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Background: In an academic center, plastic surgery provides multiple important and distinct services. Limited data exist on how each service affects a department clinically and financially.

Methods: All new patient consultations and surgical cases between 2004 and 2012 were reviewed. Conversion rates from consultation to surgery and relative value units were calculated. Professional and facility revenues, costs, and net income were ascertained. These measures were compared between different subspecialties.

Results: A total of 12,020 new patient consultations and 5741 surgical cases were reviewed. Total growth in consultations was greatest for breast reconstruction (396.8 percent), followed by aesthetic (83.8 percent), oncology (12.9 percent), general (-16.9 percent), and burn/trauma (-75.0 percent). The conversion rate from consultation to surgery was highest in breast reconstruction (57.0 ± 3.1 percent) and oncology (56.9 ± 6.6 percent), followed by burn/trauma (47.0 ± 6.8 percent), general (46.1 ± 3.5 percent), and aesthetic (37.0 ± 4.8 percent). Total growth in professional net income was greatest for breast reconstruction (1241.4 percent), followed by oncology (378.4 percent), general (159.7 percent), aesthetic (130.5 percent), and burn/trauma (-20.9 percent). Total growth in facility net income was greatest for breast reconstruction (7619.5 percent), followed by oncology (2648.0 percent), aesthetic (432.3 percent), general (283.3 percent), and burn/trauma (108.7 percent).

Conclusions: Breast reconstruction exhibited the greatest growth in consultations, and oncologic consultations demonstrated the highest consultation-to-surgery conversion rate. The higher consultation volume and conversion rate associated with breast reconstruction resulted in greater financial gains for both the department and the hospital. These findings may be of utility in the development of academic plastic surgery programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang TY, Nelson JA, Corrigan D, Commack T, Serletti JM. Contribution of plastic surgery to a health care system: Our economic value to hospital profitability. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:154e–160e
    1. Alderman AK, Storey AF, Nair NS, Chung KC. Financial impact of breast reconstruction on an academic surgical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1408–1413
    1. Hasan JS, Chung KC, Storey AF, Bolg ML, Taheri PA. Financial impact of hand surgery programs on academic medical centers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:627–635
    1. Lee BT, Yueh JH, Chen C, Lin SJ, Tobias AM, Slavin SA. Establishment of perforator flap programs for breast reconstruction: The New England program experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1410–1418
    1. Hoppe IC, Pastor CJ, Paik AM. An analysis of leading, lagging, and coincident economic indicators in the United States and its relationship to the volume of plastic surgery procedures performed. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69:471–473