Effect of explicit water molecules on ligand-binding affinities calculated with the MM/GBSA approach
- PMID: 24869780
- DOI: 10.1007/s00894-014-2273-x
Effect of explicit water molecules on ligand-binding affinities calculated with the MM/GBSA approach
Abstract
We tested different approaches to including the effect of binding-site water molecules for ligand-binding affinities within the MM/GBSA approach (molecular mechanics combined with generalised Born and surface-area solvation). As a test case, we studied the binding of nine phenol analogues to ferritin. The effect of water molecules mediating the interaction between the receptor and the ligand can be studied by considering a few water molecules as a part of the receptor. We extended previous methods by allowing for a variable number of water molecules in the binding site. The effect of displaced water molecules can also be considered within the MM/GBSA philosophy by calculating the affinities of binding-site water molecules, both before and after binding of the ligand. To obtain proper energies, both the water molecules and the ligand need then to be converted to non-interacting ghost molecules and a single-average approach (i.e., the same structures are used for bound and unbound states) based on the simulations of both the complex and the free receptor can be used to improve the precision. The only problem is to estimate the free energy of an unbound water molecule. With an experimental estimate of this parameter, promising results were obtained for our test case.
Similar articles
-
Binding-affinity predictions of HSP90 in the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 with docking, MM/GBSA, QM/MM, and free-energy simulations.J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016 Sep;30(9):707-730. doi: 10.1007/s10822-016-9942-z. Epub 2016 Aug 26. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2016. PMID: 27565797 Free PMC article.
-
Accurate predictions of nonpolar solvation free energies require explicit consideration of binding-site hydration.J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Aug 24;133(33):13081-92. doi: 10.1021/ja202972m. Epub 2011 Jul 29. J Am Chem Soc. 2011. PMID: 21728337
-
Can MM/GBSA calculations be sped up by system truncation?J Comput Chem. 2018 Mar 15;39(7):361-372. doi: 10.1002/jcc.25120. Epub 2017 Nov 26. J Comput Chem. 2018. PMID: 29178493
-
The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015 May;10(5):449-61. doi: 10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936. Epub 2015 Apr 2. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015. PMID: 25835573 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Molecular modeling of hydration in drug design.Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2007 May;10(3):275-80. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2007. PMID: 17554853 Review.
Cited by
-
Mutations responsible for the carbapenemase activity of SME-1.RSC Adv. 2022 Aug 15;12(35):22826-22842. doi: 10.1039/d2ra02849b. eCollection 2022 Aug 10. RSC Adv. 2022. PMID: 36105999 Free PMC article.
-
Reliable In Silico Ranking of Engineered Therapeutic TCR Binding Affinities with MMPB/GBSA.J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Feb 14;62(3):577-590. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00765. Epub 2022 Jan 20. J Chem Inf Model. 2022. PMID: 35049312 Free PMC article.
-
How THC works: Explaining ligand affinity for, and partial agonism of, cannabinoid receptor 1.iScience. 2025 May 21;28(7):112706. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112706. eCollection 2025 Jul 18. iScience. 2025. PMID: 40687805 Free PMC article.
-
Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Drug-Target Binding by Molecular Simulation.Chem Rev. 2020 Dec 9;120(23):12788-12833. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00534. Epub 2020 Oct 2. Chem Rev. 2020. PMID: 33006893 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Small Molecules Targeting the Inactive Form of the Mnk1/2 Kinases.ACS Omega. 2017 Nov 30;2(11):7881-7891. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01403. Epub 2017 Nov 14. ACS Omega. 2017. PMID: 30023565 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials