Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;160(1):24-31.
doi: 10.1007/s12011-014-0017-5. Epub 2014 May 30.

Fluoride in the bones of foxes (Vulpes vulpes Linneaus, 1758) and raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray, 1834) from North-Western Poland

Affiliations

Fluoride in the bones of foxes (Vulpes vulpes Linneaus, 1758) and raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides Gray, 1834) from North-Western Poland

Mirona Palczewska-Komsa et al. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Assessment of exposure to fluoride (F(-)) is increasingly focused on mineralized tissues, mainly bones. Their periodic growth and continuous reconstruction make them a good material for studying long-term F(-) accumulation. In this study, F(-)concentrations were determined in the bones of foxes and raccoon dogs from north-western Poland and relationships between bone F(-) and the age categories of the animals were attempted to be identified. Bone samples were collected from femurs of 32 foxes (15 males and 17 females) and 18 raccoon dogs (10 males and 8 females) from polluted, medium-polluted, and unpolluted by F(-) areas. Bone F(-) was determined by potentiometric method, and results were expressed per dry weight (dw); they ranged from 176 to 3,668 mg/kg dw in foxes and from 84 to 1,190 mg/kg dw in raccoon dogs. Foxes from north-western Poland accumulated much more F(-) in their bones than raccoon dogs. Our study shows that the assessment of hazards created by industrial emitters can be conducted conveniently by the measurements of fluorine content in hard tissues of wild animals. Due to availability of such type of material for studies, it seems that the analysis of fluoride content in bones can be a good tool in the development of ecotoxicology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of Poland including the study area in West Pomeranian voivodship (WP V) and Lubuskie voivodship (L V) with plants, electricity, and refinery emitting fluorides and direction of predominant winds (arrow)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dobrzanski Z, Gorecka H. Fluorine in poultry nutrition. Drobiarstwo Pol. 2001;3:13–15.
    1. Inoue M, LeGeros RZ, Inoue M, Riviera RS, Sathi GA, Tsujigiwa H, et al. Fluoride supplement affects bone mineralization in young rats. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2006;15:61–64. doi: 10.2485/jhtb.15.61. - DOI
    1. Ghosh A, Mukherjee K, Ghosh SK, Saha B. Sources and toxicity of fluoride in the environment. Res Chem Intermed. 2013;39:2881–2915. doi: 10.1007/s11164-012-0841-1. - DOI
    1. Harrison PTC. Fluoride in water: a UK perspective. J Fluor Chem. 2005;126:1448–1456. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2005.09.009. - DOI
    1. Verkerk RHJ. The paradox of overlapping micronutrient risk and benefits obligates risk/benefit analysis. Toxicology. 2010;278:27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2010.02.011. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources