Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;9(6):665-70.
doi: 10.1007/s11739-014-1080-9. Epub 2014 May 29.

Diagnostic performance of emergency transthoracic focus cardiac ultrasound in suspected acute type A aortic dissection

Affiliations

Diagnostic performance of emergency transthoracic focus cardiac ultrasound in suspected acute type A aortic dissection

Peiman Nazerian et al. Intern Emerg Med. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Type A aortic dissection (AD) is a deadly disease. Rapid identification of patients requiring immediate advanced aortic imaging or transfer to specialized centers is needed to improve outcomes. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of transthoracic focus cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) performed by emergency physicians, alone and in combination with the aortic dissection detection (ADD) risk score in suspected type A AD. This was a prospective study performed on patients with suspected type A AD. FOCUS evaluated the presence of intimal flap/intramural hematoma (direct signs of AD), ascending aorta dilatation, aortic valve insufficiency or pericardial effusion/tamponade (indirect signs of AD). The ADD risk score of each patient was calculated according to guidelines. The final diagnosis was established after review of complete clinical data. 50 (18%) patients of 281 had a final diagnosis of type A AD. Detection of any FOCUS sign (direct or indirect) of AD had a sensitivity of 88% (95% CI 76-95%) for the diagnosis of type A AD. Presence of ADD risk score > 0 or detection of any FOCUS sign increased diagnostic sensitivity to 96% (95% CI 86-99%). Detection of direct FOCUS signs had a specificity of 94% (95% CI 90-97%), while combination of ADD risk score > 1 with detection of direct FOCUS signs had a specificity of 98% (95% CI 96-99%). FOCUS demonstrated acceptable accuracy as a triage tool to rapidly identify patients with suspected type A AD needing advanced aortic imaging or transfer, but it cannot be used as a stand-alone test even if combined with ADD risk score classification.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989 Jan-Feb;2(1):17-24 - PubMed
    1. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Dec;23(12):1225-30 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jan 7;328(1):35-43 - PubMed
    1. Eur Heart J. 1983 Mar;4(3):196-202 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2000 Feb 16;283(7):897-903 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources