Differences in microorganism growth on various dressings used to cover injection sites: inspection of the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacilli
- PMID: 24871954
- DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-0935-z
Differences in microorganism growth on various dressings used to cover injection sites: inspection of the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacilli
Abstract
Purposes: Sepsis caused by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) is the most serious catheter-related bloodstream infection. However, the cause(s) of GNB propagation on the skin around needle or catheter insertion sites remain unclear. This observational study aimed to assess the differences in the microbial growth among various types of dressings used to cover injection sites, with a particular focus on GNB.
Methods: We analyzed the bacterial populations on three types of surgical dressings; Tegaderm I.V. (semi-permeable, 27 sheets), IV3000 (highly permeable, 34 sheets) and Tegaderm CHG (chlorhexidine-impregnated, 26 sheets). The peripheral catheter site dressing was replaced every 3 days or when there was leakage or pain at the catheter site.
Results: Bacterial growth was observed in all Tegaderm I.V. and IV3000 sheets and in only one (3.8%) Tegaderm CHG sheet. The GNB detection rate was significantly lower in the IV3000 group (2.9%) than in the Tegaderm I.V. group (63.0%). No GNB growth was identified in the Tegaderm CHG group.
Conclusions: Semi-permeable dressings were insufficient to prevent GNB infections, whereas highly permeable or chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings could prevent GNB infections. Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings can control almost all bacterial growth.
Similar articles
-
[The Incidences of Catheter Colonization and Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection According to Tegaderm vs. Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG)-Tegaderm Dressing].J Korean Acad Nurs. 2020 Aug;50(4):541-553. doi: 10.4040/jkan.19215. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2020. PMID: 32895341 Korean.
-
Efficacy of chlorhexidine patches on central line-associated bloodstream infections in children.Pediatr Int. 2020 Jul;62(7):789-796. doi: 10.1111/ped.14200. Epub 2020 Jul 9. Pediatr Int. 2020. PMID: 32065485 Clinical Trial.
-
Tegaderm CHG IV Securement Dressing for Central Venous and Arterial Catheter Insertion Sites: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Apr;14(2):135-49. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0202-5. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016. PMID: 26458938 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge versus chlorhexidine gel dressing for short-term intravascular catheters: which one is better?Crit Care. 2020 Jul 23;24(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03174-0. Crit Care. 2020. PMID: 32703235 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of chlorhexidine dressings to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections. Does one size fit all? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;41(12):1388-1395. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.356. Epub 2020 Sep 16. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020. PMID: 32935659
Cited by
-
Comparative efficacy of 13 antimicrobial dressings and different securement devices in reducing catheter-related bloodstream infections: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(14):e14940. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014940. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 30946317 Free PMC article.
-
A new dressing system for accelerating wound recovery after primary total knee arthroplasty: a feasibility study.BMC Surg. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02409-z. BMC Surg. 2024. PMID: 38622645 Free PMC article.
-
A waterproof, low-cost dressing system reduces postoperative wound dressing changes in primary total hip arthroplasty: An efficacy study.Front Surg. 2022 Aug 11;9:966874. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.966874. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36034351 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical