Virtual monoenergetic dual-energy computed tomography: optimization of kiloelectron volt settings in head and neck cancer
- PMID: 24872006
- DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000077
Virtual monoenergetic dual-energy computed tomography: optimization of kiloelectron volt settings in head and neck cancer
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on objective and subjective image quality of virtual monoenergetic reconstructions at various energy levels of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in patients with head and neck cancer.
Materials and methods: We included 71 (53 men, 18 women; age, 59.3 ± 12.0 years; range, 33-90 years) patients with biopsy-proven untreated primary (n = 55) or recurrent (n = 16) squamous cell carcinoma who underwent head and neck DECT. Images were reconstructed with a linear blending setting emulating 120 kV acquisition (M_0.3; 30% of 80 kV, 70% of 140 kV spectrum) and as virtual monoenergetic images with photon energies of 40, 60, 80, and 100 keV. Attenuation of lesion, various anatomic landmarks, and image noise were objectively measured, and lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Two independent blinded radiologists subjectively rated each image series using a 5-point grading scale regarding overall image quality, lesion delineation, image sharpness, and image noise.
Results: Tumor attenuation peaked at 40 keV (140.2 ± 42.6 HU) followed by the 60 keV (121.7 ± 25.5 HU) and M_0.3 series (102.7 ± 22.3; all P < 0.001). However, the calculated lesion CNR was highest in the 60 keV reconstructions (12.45 ± 7.17), 80 keV reconstructions (8.66 ± 6.58), and M_0.3 series (5.21 ± 3.15; all P < 0.001) and superior to the other monoenergetic series (all P < 0.001). Subjective image analysis was highest for the 60 keV series regarding overall image quality (4.22; κ = 0.411) and lesion delineation (4.35; κ = 0.459) followed by the M_0.3 series (3.81; κ = 0.394; 3.77; κ = 0.451; all P < 0.001). Image sharpness showed no significant difference between both series (3.81 vs 3.79; P = 0.78). Image noise was rated superior in the 80 and 100 keV series (4.31 vs 4.34; P = 0.522).
Conclusions: Compared with linearly blended images, virtual monoenergetic reconstructions of DECT data at 60 keV significantly improve lesion enhancement and CNR, subjective overall image quality, and tumor delineation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Similar articles
-
Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Virtual Monoenergetic Imaging of Lung Cancer: Assessment of Optimal Energy Levels.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016 Jan-Feb;40(1):80-5. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000319. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016. PMID: 26466115
-
Noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic dual-energy computed tomography: optimization of kiloelectron volt settings in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Mar;42(3):718-726. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-1011-5. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017. PMID: 27999889
-
Non-linear image blending improves visualization of head and neck primary squamous cell carcinoma compared to linear blending in dual-energy CT.Clin Radiol. 2015 Feb;70(2):168-75. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.10.018. Epub 2014 Dec 6. Clin Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25491926
-
Review of Clinical Applications for Virtual Monoenergetic Dual-Energy CT.Radiology. 2019 Nov;293(2):260-271. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182297. Epub 2019 Sep 10. Radiology. 2019. PMID: 31502938 Review.
-
Applications of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Artifact Reduction in the Head, Neck, and Spine.Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2017 Aug;27(3):489-497. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Jun 4. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2017. PMID: 28711208 Review.
Cited by
-
Fast-switching dual energy cone beam computed tomography using the on-board imager of a commercial linear accelerator.Phys Med Biol. 2020 Jan 13;65(1):015013. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5c35. Phys Med Biol. 2020. PMID: 31775131 Free PMC article.
-
Dual-energy CT in head and neck applications.Neuroradiol J. 2025 Jan 8:19714009251313507. doi: 10.1177/19714009251313507. Online ahead of print. Neuroradiol J. 2025. PMID: 39773001 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Head and neck automatic multi-organ segmentation on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography.Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Sep 30;32:100654. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100654. eCollection 2024 Oct. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39803347 Free PMC article.
-
Know your way around acute unenhanced CT during global iodinated contrast crisis: a refresher to ED radiologists.Emerg Radiol. 2022 Dec;29(6):1019-1031. doi: 10.1007/s10140-022-02085-7. Epub 2022 Aug 10. Emerg Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35945464 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dual energy computed tomography virtual monoenergetic imaging: technique and clinical applications.Br J Radiol. 2019 Jun;92(1098):20180546. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180546. Epub 2019 Apr 9. Br J Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30919651 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical