Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jun;13(3):326-30.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.12293. Epub 2014 May 28.

Patient perception of wound photography

Affiliations

Patient perception of wound photography

Sheila C Wang et al. Int Wound J. 2016 Jun.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to provide an assessment of photographic documentation of the wound from the patients' perspective and to evaluate whether this could improve patients' understanding of and involvement in their wound care. Our results revealed that most patients visiting the wound care clinic have difficult-to-see wounds (86%). Only 20% of patients monitor their wounds and instead rely on clinic or nurse visits to track the healing progress. There was a significant association between patients' ability to see their wound and their subsequent memory of the wound's appearance. This was especially true for patients who had recently begun visiting the wound care clinic. This relationship was not present in patients who had visited the clinic for 3 or more years. Patients reported that the inability to see their wounds resulted in feeling a loss of autonomy. The majority of patients reported that photographing their wounds would help them to track the wound progress (81%) and would afford them more involvement in their own care (58%). This study provides a current representation of wound photography from the patients' perspective and reveals that it can motivate patients to become more involved in the management of their wounds - particularly for patients with difficult-to-see wounds.

Keywords: Patient perception; Photography; Wound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of locations of patients' wounds.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reported memory for wounds based on visual access.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Density plot of memory for wound by visibility across time.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Patients' endorsement of photographs to help track healing.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Participants' endorsement of the idea that photographs would promote active participation in care.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rajbhandari SM, Harris ND, Sutton M, Lockett C, Eaton S, Gadour M, Tesfaye S, Ward JD. Digital imaging: an accurate and easy method of measuring foot ulcers. Diabet Med 1999;16:339–42. - PubMed
    1. Samad A, Hayes S, French L, Dodds S. Digital imaging versus conventional contact tracing for the objective measurement of venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 2002;11:137–40. - PubMed
    1. Fischetti LF, Paguio EC, Alt‐White AC. Digitized images of wounds: a nursing practice innovation. Nurs Clin North Am 2000;35:541–50. - PubMed
    1. Langemo D, Hanson D, Anderson J, Thompson P, Hunter S. Digital wound photography: points to practice. Adv Skin Wound Care 2006;19:386–7. - PubMed
    1. Alder ME, Deahl ST, Matteson SR. Clinical usefulness of two‐dimensional reformatted and three‐ dimensionally rendered computerized tomographic images: literature review and a survey of surgeons' opinions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:375–86. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources