Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2014 Dec;34(12):898-900.
doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.103. Epub 2014 May 29.

Severe perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery: the impact of occiput posterior position

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Severe perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery: the impact of occiput posterior position

E Hirsch et al. J Perinatol. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To identify risk factors for severe (third/fourth degree) perineal laceration with operative vaginal delivery (OVD, forceps or vacuum).

Study design: Case-control study comparing singleton OVDs with or without severe laceration (n=138).

Result: In multivariable analyses, severe perineal laceration was associated with occiput posterior (OP) position at delivery, vaginal nulliparity, use of forceps, longer period pushing in the second stage and lower gestational age, but not birth weight, labor induction or episiotomy. Among 29 OP patients at full dilation, 9/13 (69%) attempted rotations to occiput anterior (OA) were successful, and 14/16 (88%) patients in whom rotation was not attempted remained OP at delivery. Successful rotation from OP to OA was associated with fewer severe lacerations than no attempt or unsuccessful rotation (22 vs 75%, P=0.01).

Conclusion: Severe perineal laceration during OVD is associated with OP position at delivery and is reduced threefold in patients successfully rotated from OP to OA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jan;136(1):25-8 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):132-137 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;108(4):863-72 - PubMed
    1. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Jan;24(1):65-72 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;193(2):525-8; discussion 528-9 - PubMed

Publication types