Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 29;4(5):e004781.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004781.

A qualitative study of stakeholder views regarding participation in locally commissioned enhanced optometric services

E Konstantakopoulou  1 , R A Harper  2 , D F Edgar  1 , J G Lawrenson  1
Affiliations

A qualitative study of stakeholder views regarding participation in locally commissioned enhanced optometric services

E Konstantakopoulou et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the views of optometrists, general practitioners (GPs) and ophthalmologists regarding the development and organisation of community-based enhanced optometric services.

Design: Qualitative study using free-text questionnaires and telephone interviews.

Setting: A minor eye conditions scheme (MECS) and a glaucoma referral refinement scheme (GRRS) are based on accredited community optometry practices.

Participants: 41 optometrists, 6 ophthalmologists and 25 GPs.

Results: The most common reason given by optometrists for participation in enhanced schemes was to further their professional development; however, as providers of 'for-profit' healthcare, it was clear that participants had also considered the impact of the schemes on their business. Lack of fit with the 'retail' business model of optometry was a frequently given reason for non-participation. The methods used for training and accreditation were generally thought to be appropriate, and participating optometrists welcomed the opportunities for ongoing training. The ophthalmologists involved in the MECS and GRRS expressed very positive views regarding the schemes and widely acknowledged that the new care pathways would reduce unnecessary referrals and shorten patient waiting times. GPs involved in the MECS were also very supportive. They felt that the scheme provided an 'expert' local opinion that could potentially reduce the number of secondary care referrals.

Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrated strong stakeholder support for the development of community-based enhanced optometric services. Although optometrists welcomed the opportunity to develop their professional skills and knowledge, enhanced schemes must also provide a sufficient financial incentive so as not to compromise the profitability of their business.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. The General Optical Council (Rules relating to Injury or Disease of the Eye) Order of Council 1999. SI No. 3267. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/3267/contents/made (accessed 23 Dec 2013).
    1. The General Optical Council (Injury or Disease of the Eye and Contact Lens (Qualifications)) (Amendment) Rules Order of Council 2005. SI No. 1476. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2005/1476/made (accessed 23 Dec 2013).
    1. Department of Health. General Ophthalmic Services Review. Findings in relation to the framework for primary ophthalmic services, the position of dispensing opticians in relation to the NHS, Local Optical Committees, and the administration of General Ophthalmic Services payments. Gateway reference: 7689 2007
    1. Park JC, Ross AH, Tole DM, et al. Evaluation of a new cataract surgery referral pathway. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:309–13 - PubMed
    1. Burns DH, Dart JK, Edgar DF. Review of the Camden and Islington Anterior Segment Eye Disease Scheme. Optom Pract 2002;3:55–60

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources