Does Device Make Any Difference? A Real-world Retrospective Study of Insulin Treatment Among Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
- PMID: 24876551
- PMCID: PMC4454098
- DOI: 10.1177/1932296813516956
Does Device Make Any Difference? A Real-world Retrospective Study of Insulin Treatment Among Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Abstract
We compared real-world clinical and economic outcomes for insulin glargine treatment administered by disposable pen and traditional vial-and-syringe injections among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Using a large database of US retirees, this retrospective longitudinal study examined 1-year follow-up outcomes in patients with T2DM aged 65 years or older who were either insulin naïve and initiated insulin glargine via disposable pen (pen initiators [PI]) or vial (vial initiators [VI]) or were already insulin glargine users but either continued with a vial (vial continuers [VC]) or switched to a disposable pen (pen switchers [PS]). There were 7856 propensity-score-matched patients, including 2930 each in the PI and VI cohorts, and 998 each in the VC and PS cohorts. Compared with vial-and-syringe users, the disposable pen users had significantly greater treatment persistence (P < .0001 for both comparisons), duration of persistence (P < .0001 for both), and adherence (P < .01 for both) and lower insulin daily average consumption (P < .05 for both). Compared with the VI cohort, the PI cohort had significantly fewer hypoglycemia-related events (P = .0164). Total health care costs were comparable for the respective matched cohorts. In elderly patients with T2DM receiving insulin glargine therapy, initiating or switching to a disposable pen was associated with better treatment persistence and adherence than initiating or continuing with vial-and-syringe, without increased total health care costs. Among insulin-naïve patients, initiating insulin glargine by disposable pen was also associated with significantly reduced risk of hypoglycemia compared with vial-and-syringe patients.
Keywords: elderly; insulin glargine; pen; type 2 diabetes.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures




Similar articles
-
Does pen help? A real-world outcomes study of switching from vial to disposable pen among insulin glargine-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Mar;15(3):230-6. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0253. Epub 2013 Jan 21. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013. PMID: 23336845
-
Clinical impact of initiating insulin glargine therapy with disposable pen versus vial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a managed care setting.Endocr Pract. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):845-52. doi: 10.4158/EP10401.OR. Endocr Pract. 2011. PMID: 21550952
-
Impact of initiating insulin glargine disposable pen versus vial/syringe on real-world glycemic outcomes and persistence among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a large managed care plan: a claims database analysis.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Sep;16(9):567-75. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0312. Epub 2014 Apr 15. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014. PMID: 24735083
-
Overview of insulin delivery pen devices.J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Sep-Oct;49(5):e118-31. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08125. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009. PMID: 19692314 Review.
-
Pen devices to improve patient adherence with insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes.Postgrad Med. 2008 Sep;120(3):172-9. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2008.09.1917. Postgrad Med. 2008. PMID: 18824835 Review.
Cited by
-
Potential Benefits of the Self-Administration of Subcutaneous Methotrexate with Autoinjector Devices for Patients: A Review.Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2021 Mar 29;13:81-94. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S290771. eCollection 2021. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2021. PMID: 33824602 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Systematic Review of Insulin Adherence Measures in Patients with Diabetes.J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Nov;22(11):1224-1246. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.11.1224. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016. PMID: 27783551 Free PMC article.
-
Ease of Use of the iGlarLixi SoloStar Pen from the LixiLan ONE CAN Pen Sub-Study: Questionnaire Findings from People Living with Type 2 Diabetes and Their HealthCare Providers.Diabetes Ther. 2023 Feb;14(2):377-386. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01353-6. Epub 2022 Dec 27. Diabetes Ther. 2023. PMID: 36574199 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges of Diabetes Care in Older People With Type 2 Diabetes and the Role of Basal Insulin.Clin Diabetes. 2019 Oct;37(4):357-367. doi: 10.2337/cd18-0074. Clin Diabetes. 2019. PMID: 31660009 Free PMC article.
-
Benchmarking Insulin Treatment Persistence Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Across Different U.S. Payer Segments.J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Mar;23(3):278-290. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.16227. Epub 2017 Feb 17. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017. PMID: 28230445 Free PMC article.
References
-
- International Diabetes Foundation. Risk factors, 2011. www.idf.org/about-diabetes/risk-factors. Accessed January 6, 2012.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2011.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2012.
-
- Resnick HE, Heineman J, Stone R, Shorr RI. Diabetes in U.S. nursing homes, 2004. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(2):287-288. - PubMed
-
- Russell LB, Valiyeva E, Roman SH, Pogach LM, Suh DC, Safford MM. Hospitalizations, nursing home admissions, and deaths attributable to diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(7):1611-1617. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous