Immediate changes in neck pain intensity and widespread pressure pain sensitivity in patients with bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial of thoracic thrust manipulation vs non-thrust mobilization
- PMID: 24880778
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.03.003
Immediate changes in neck pain intensity and widespread pressure pain sensitivity in patients with bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial of thoracic thrust manipulation vs non-thrust mobilization
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of thoracic thrust manipulation vs thoracic non-thrust mobilization in patients with bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain on pressure pain sensitivity and neck pain intensity.
Methods: Fifty-two patients (58% were female) were randomly assigned to a thoracic spine thrust manipulation group or of thoracic non-thrust mobilization group. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) over C5-C6 zygapophyseal joint, second metacarpal, and tibialis anterior muscle and neck pain intensity (11-point Numerical Pain Rate Scale) were collected at baseline and 10 minutes after the intervention by an assessor blinded to group allocation. Mixed-model analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were used to examine the effects of the treatment on each outcome. The primary analysis was the group * time interaction.
Results: No significant interactions were found with the mixed-model ANOVAs for any PPT (C5-C6: P>.252; second metacarpal: P>.452; tibialis anterior: P>.273): both groups exhibited similar increases in PPT (all, P<.01), but within-group and between-group effect sizes were small (standardized mean score difference [SMD]<0.22). The ANOVA found that patients receiving thoracic spine thrust manipulation experienced a greater decrease in neck pain (between-group mean difference: 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.1) than did those receiving thoracic spine non-thrust mobilization (P<.001). Within-group effect sizes were large for both groups (SMD>2.1), and between-group effect size was also large (SMD = 1.3) in favor of the manipulative group.
Conclusions: The results of this randomized clinical trial suggest that thoracic thrust manipulation and non-thrust mobilization induce similar changes in widespread PPT in individuals with mechanical neck pain; however, the changes were clinically small. We also found that thoracic thrust manipulation was more effective than thoracic non-thrust mobilization for decreasing intensity of neck pain for patients with bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain.
Keywords: Manual Therapy; Neck Pain; Pressure; Spine.
Copyright © 2014 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Immediate changes in widespread pressure pain sensitivity, neck pain, and cervical range of motion after cervical or thoracic thrust manipulation in patients with bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Sep;42(9):806-14. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.4151. Epub 2012 Jun 18. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012. PMID: 22711239 Clinical Trial.
-
Short-term effects of thrust versus nonthrust mobilization/manipulation directed at the thoracic spine in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.Phys Ther. 2007 Apr;87(4):431-40. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060217. Epub 2007 Mar 6. Phys Ther. 2007. PMID: 17341509 Clinical Trial.
-
Changes in Cervicocephalic Kinesthetic Sensibility, Widespread Pressure Pain Sensitivity, and Neck Pain After Cervical Thrust Manipulation in Patients With Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Sep;41(7):551-560. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.02.004. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018. PMID: 30442354 Clinical Trial.
-
Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of mechanical neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):e0211877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211877. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30759118 Free PMC article.
-
Manipulation and Mobilization for Treating Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for an Appropriateness Panel.Pain Physician. 2019 Mar;22(2):E55-E70. Pain Physician. 2019. PMID: 30921975 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
The effect of massage technique plus thoracic manipulation versus thoracic manipulation on pain and neural tension in mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.J Phys Ther Sci. 2019 Feb;31(2):195-201. doi: 10.1589/jpts.31.195. Epub 2019 Feb 7. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019. PMID: 30858662 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies to overcome size and mechanical disadvantages in manual therapy.J Man Manip Ther. 2016 Jul;24(3):120-7. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2015.1119371. J Man Manip Ther. 2016. PMID: 27559282 Free PMC article. Review.
-
CAVITATION SOUNDS DURING CERVICOTHORACIC SPINAL MANIPULATION.Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Aug;12(4):642-654. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017. PMID: 28900571 Free PMC article.
-
Manipulation-induced hypoalgesia in musculoskeletal pain populations: a systematic critical review and meta-analysis.Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Jan 29;27:7. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0226-7. eCollection 2019. Chiropr Man Therap. 2019. PMID: 30719281 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and safety of thoracic manipulation in the treatment of neck pain: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Technol Health Care. 2024;32(S1):385-402. doi: 10.3233/THC-248034. Technol Health Care. 2024. PMID: 38759063 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous