Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Feb;2(1):39-41.
doi: 10.1007/BF03168014.

Impact of image size on effectiveness of digital imaging systems

Affiliations

Impact of image size on effectiveness of digital imaging systems

P D Fisher et al. J Digit Imaging. 1989 Feb.

Abstract

Radiologists detect small diagnostic signals in radiographic film images by altering the distance between the eye and the image, effectively zooming in on a particular detail. Details thus enlarged are more perceptible to the viewer. Considering that conventional film images are nearly life-size, the potential for increasing the detection of small signals in this manner is high. Digital images, however, presented in video format are usually smaller than life-size, sometimes more than 50% smaller. While local enlargements using computer-based imaging systems are extremely useful, the radiologist cannot examine a whole, life-size image. The importance of the latter in the diagnostic process is revealed in detection studies using the same images of a chest phantom with small nodular inclusions, in different size formats. A clear positive correlation exists between overall image size and the detection of signals that are of a diagnostically-relevant size. While it is widely accepted that image fidelity is an important determinant in the clinical acceptability of digital radiography, digital image displays should also be large enough to display life-size images.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1977 Aug;129(2):205-8 - PubMed
    1. Med Radiogr Photogr. 1984;60(1):1-48 - PubMed
    1. J Digit Imaging. 1989 Feb;2(1):42-7 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Feb;148(2):421-6 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1986 Jan;158(1):11-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources