Measurement equivalence of the Empowerment Scale for White and Black persons with severe mental illness
- PMID: 24884300
- PMCID: PMC4254373
- DOI: 10.1037/prj0000069
Measurement equivalence of the Empowerment Scale for White and Black persons with severe mental illness
Abstract
Objective: The current study examined the measurement equivalence on a measure of personal empowerment for Black and White consumers of mental health services.
Method: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess measurement equivalence of the 28-item Empowerment Scale (Rogers, Chamberlin, Ellison, & Crean, 1997), using data from 1,035 White and 301 Black persons with severe mental illness.
Results: Metric invariance of the Empowerment Scale was supported, in that the factor structure and loadings were equivalent across groups. Scalar invariance was violated on 3 items; however, the impact of these items on scale scores was quite small. Finally, subscales of empowerment tended to be more highly intercorrelated for Black than for White respondents.
Conclusions and implications for practice: RESULTS generally support the use of Empowerment Scale for ethnic group comparisons. However, subtle differences in the psychometric properties of this measure suggest that Black and White individuals may conceptualize the construct of empowerment in different ways. Specifically, Black respondents had a lower threshold for endorsing some items on the self-esteem and powerlessness dimensions. Further, White respondents viewed the 3 dimensions of empowerment (self-esteem, powerlessness, and activism) as more distinct, whereas these 3 traits were more strongly interrelated for Blacks.
(c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.
References
-
- Alverson H, Vicente E. An ethnographic study of vocational rehabilitation for Puerto Rican Americans with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 1998;22(1):69–72.
-
- Atdjian S, Vega VA. Disparities in mental health treatment in U.S. racial and ethnic minority groups: Implications for psychiatrists. Psychiatric Service. 2005;56(12):1600–1602. - PubMed
-
- Bryant FB, Satorra A. Principles and practice of scaled difference chi-square testing. Structure Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2012;19:372–398.
-
- Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; Mahwah, NJ: 1998.
-
- Campbell J. Consumer-Operated Services Program (COSP) Multisite Research Initiative: Overview and Preliminary Findings. Missouri Institute of Mental Health; Saint Louis, MO: 2004.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
