Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 May 2:14:143.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-143.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of dietary supplement use by military personnel

Joseph J Knapik  1 , Ryan A Steelman, Sally S Hoedebecke, Emily K Farina, Krista G Austin, Harris R Lieberman
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of dietary supplement use by military personnel

Joseph J Knapik et al. BMC Complement Altern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Although a number of studies have been conducted on the prevalence of dietary supplement (DS) use in military personnel, these investigations have not been previously summarized. This article provides a systematic literature review of this topic.

Methods: Literature databases, reference lists, and other sources were searched to find studies that quantitatively examined the prevalence of DS use in uniformed military groups. Prevalence data were summarized by gender and military service. Where there were at least two investigations, meta-analysis was performed using a random model and homogeneity of the prevalence values was assessed.

Results: The prevalence of any DS use for Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps men was 55%, 60%, 60%, and 61%, respectively; for women corresponding values were 65%, 71%, 76%, and 71%, respectively. Prevalence of multivitamin and/or multimineral (MVM) use for Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps men was 32%, 46%, 47%, and 41%, respectively; for women corresponding values were 40%, 55%, 63%, and 53%, respectively. Use prevalence of any individual vitamin or mineral supplement for Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps men was 18%, 27%, 25%, and 24%, respectively; for women corresponding values were 29%, 36%, 40%, and 33%, respectively. Men in elite military groups (Navy Special Operations, Army Rangers, and Army Special Forces) had a use prevalence of 76% for any DS and 37% for MVM, although individual studies were not homogenous. Among Army men, Army women, and elite military men, use prevalence of Vitamin C was 15% for all three groups; for Vitamin E, use prevalence was 8%, 7%, and 9%, respectively; for sport drinks, use prevalence was 22%, 25% and 39%, respectively. Use prevalence of herbal supplements was generally low compared to vitamins, minerals, and sport drinks, ≤5% in most investigations.

Conclusions: Compared to men, military women had a higher use prevalence of any DS and MVM. Army men and women tended to use DSs and MVM less than other service members. Elite military men appeared to use DSs and sport drinks more than other service members.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Records included and excluded at each stage of literature review.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Strengthening knowledge and understanding of dietary supplements. [ http://ods.od.nih.gov/About/DSHEA_Wording.aspx], accessed 4 February 2013.
    1. Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. [ http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Legislation/FederalFoodDrugandC...], accessed 11 March 2013.
    1. Saldanha LG. The dietary supplement marketplace. Constantly evolving. Nutr Today. 2007;42(2):52–54. doi: 10.1097/01.NT.0000267126.88640.3d. - DOI
    1. Considering a post-DSHEA World. Nutr Bus J. 2012;17(5/6):1, 3–9.
    1. Deuster PA, Sridhar A, Becker WJ, Coll R, O’Brien KK, Bathalon G. Health assessment of U.S. Army Rangers. Mil Med. 2003;168(1):57–62. - PubMed

Publication types