Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 May 28:14:58.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-58.

Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial

Daniela Hesse et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: The resin-based pit and fissure sealant is considered a successful tool in caries prevention, however there is a growing evidence of its use in controlling already established caries in posterior teeth. The aim of this clinical trial is to verify the efficacy of pit and fissure sealants in arresting dentinal caries lesions compared to partial excavation and restorative treatment in primary molar teeth.

Methods: Thirty six patients with occlusal cavitated primary molar reaching outer half of dentin were selected. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups: sealant application (experimental group - n = 17) and restoration with composite resin (control group - n = 19). Clinical and radiograph evaluation were performed after 6, 12 and 18 months. The chi-square test was used to verify the distribution of characteristics variables of the sample among the groups. The survival rate of treatments was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival and log-rank test. Fisher's Exact and logistic regression tests were calculated in each evaluation period (α = 5%).

Results: The control group showed significantly better clinical survival after 18 months (p = 0.0025). In both groups, no caries progression was registered on the radiographic evaluations.

Conclusions: Sealing had similar efficacy in the arrestment of caries progression of cavitated occlusal lesions compared to partial excavation of the lesions, even though the frequency of re-treatments was significantly higher in sealed lesions.

Trial registration: Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (ReBEC): RBR-9kkv53.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort flow diagram of the trial.n number of children.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the clinical evaluation. Log-rank, p = 0.0053.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pitts NB. Are we ready to move from operative to non-operative/preventive treatment of dental caries in clinical practice? Caries Res. 2004;38:294–304. doi: 10.1159/000077769. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beauchamp J, Caufield PW, Crall JJ, Donly K, Feigal R, Gooch B, Ismail A, Kohn W, Siegal M, Simonsen R. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:257–268. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kidd EA. How ‘clean’ must a cavity be before restoration? Caries Res. 2004;38:305–313. doi: 10.1159/000077770. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kervanto-Seppälä S, Pietilä I, Meurman JH, Kerosuo E. Pit and fissure sealants in dental public health - application criteria and general policy in Finland. BMC Oral Health. 2009;9:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-9-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azarpazhooh A, Main PA. Pit and fissure sealants in the prevention of dental caries in children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Can Dent Assoc. 2008;74:171–177. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms