Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 13:14:215.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-215.

A qualitative study of contextual factors' impact on measures to reduce surgery cancellations

Affiliations

A qualitative study of contextual factors' impact on measures to reduce surgery cancellations

Einar Hovlid et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Contextual factors influence quality improvement outcomes. Understanding this influence is important when adapting and implementing interventions and translating improvements into new settings. To date, there is limited knowledge about how contextual factors influence quality improvement processes. In this study, we explore how contextual factors affected measures to reduce surgery cancellations, which are a persistent problem in healthcare. We discuss the usefulness of the theoretical framework provided by the model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ) for this kind of research.

Method: We performed a qualitative case study at Førde Hospital, Norway, where we had previously demonstrated a reduction in surgery cancellations. We interviewed 20 clinicians and performed content analysis to explore how contextual factors affected measures to reduce cancellations of planned surgeries.

Results: We identified three common themes concerning how contextual factors influenced the change process: 1) identifying a need to change, 2) facilitating system-wide improvement, and 3) leader involvement and support. Input from patients helped identify a need to change and contributed to the consensus that change was necessary. Reducing cancellations required improving the clinical system. This improvement process was based on a strategy that emphasized the involvement of frontline clinicians in detecting and improving system problems. Clinicians shared information about their work by participating in improvement teams to develop a more complete understanding of the clinical system and its interdependencies. This new understanding allowed clinicians to detect system problems and design adequate interventions. Middle managers' participation in the improvement teams and in regular work processes was important for successfully implementing and adapting interventions.

Conclusion: Contextual factors interacted with one another and with the interventions to facilitate changes in the clinical system, reducing surgery cancellations. The MUSIQ framework is useful for exploring how contextual factors influence the improvement process and how they influence one another. Discussing data in relation to a theoretical framework can promote greater uniformity in reporting findings, facilitating knowledge-building across studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Øvretveit J. Understanding the conditions for improvement: research to discover which context influences affect improvement success. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;14(Suppl 1):i18–i23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.045955. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H, Cosgrove S, Sexton B, Hyzy R, Welsh R, Roth G, Bander J, Kepros J, Goeschel C. An Intervention to Decrease Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;14(26):2725–2732. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061115. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa061115. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa061115. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Øvretveit JC, Shekelle PG, Dy SM, McDonald KM, Hempel S, Pronovost P, Rubenstein L, Taylor SL, Foy R, Wachter RM. How does context affect interventions to improve patient safety? An assessment of evidence from studies of five patient safety practices and proposals for research. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;14(7):604–610. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.047035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaplan HC, Brady PW, Dritz MC, Hooper DK, Linam WM, Froehle CM, Margolis P. The Influence of Context on Quality Improvement Success in Health Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Milbank Q. 2010;14(4):500–560. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00611.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Øvretveit J. A Framework for Quality Improvement Translation: Understanding the Conditionality of Interventions. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2004;14(Supplement 1):15–24.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources