Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 19;46(1):32.
doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-32.

Total cost estimation for implementing genome-enabled selection in a multi-level swine production system

Affiliations

Total cost estimation for implementing genome-enabled selection in a multi-level swine production system

Caitlyn E Abell et al. Genet Sel Evol. .

Abstract

Background: Determining an animal's genetic merit using genomic information can improve estimated breeding value (EBV) accuracy; however, the magnitude of the accuracy improvement must be large enough to recover the costs associated with implementing genome-enabled selection. One way to reduce costs is to genotype nucleus herd selection candidates using a low-density chip and to use high-density chip genotyping for animals that are used as parents in the nucleus breeding herd. The objective of this study was to develop a tool to estimate the cost structure associated with incorporating genome-enabled selection into multi-level commercial breeding programs.

Results: For the purpose of this deterministic study, it was assumed that a commercial pig is created from a terminal line sire and a dam that is a cross between two maternal lines. It was also assumed that all male and female selection candidates from the 1000 sow maternal line nucleus herds were genotyped at low density and all animals used for breeding at high density. With the assumptions used in this analysis, it was estimated that genome-enabled selection costs for a maternal line would be approximately US$0.082 per weaned pig in the commercial production system. A total of US$0.164 per weaned pig is needed to incorporate genome-enabled selection into the two maternal lines. Similarly, for a 600 sow terminal line nucleus herd and genotyping only male selection candidates with the low-density panel, the cost per weaned pig in the commercial herd was estimated to be US$0.044. This means that US$0.21 per weaned pig produced at the commercial level and sired by boars obtained from the nucleus herd breeding program needs to be added to the genetic merit value in order to break even on the additional cost required when genome-enabled selection is used in both maternal lines and the terminal line.

Conclusions: By modifying the input values, such as herd size and genotyping strategy, a flexible spreadsheet tool developed from this work can be used to estimate the additional costs associated with genome-enabled selection. This tool will aid breeders in estimating the economic viability of incorporating genome-enabled selection into their specific breeding program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Value of expected improvement in genetic merit at the commercial level. Current rates of genetic improvement were based on genetic improvement published by the National Swine Registry for each of the three lines; the cost of genome-enabled selection was estimated using the values reported in this paper.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Feasible region for profitability when incorporating genome-enabled selection in a terminal line selection program. The current annual rate of genetic improvement was assumed to be US$0.15 per commercial pig; the number of commercial pigs produced from the nucleus boars was calculated using the values reported in the paper; the estimated cost of genome-enabled selection in the terminal line was US$491 048; this number was estimated using the strategy in this paper.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Feasible region for profitability when incorporating genome-enabled selection in a maternal line selection program. The current annual rate of genetic improvement was assumed to be US$0.10 per commercial pig; the number of commercial pigs produced from the nucleus boars was calculated using the values reported in the paper; the estimated cost of genome-enabled selection in the terminal line was US$1 698 815; this number was estimated using the strategy in this paper.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Evaluation of marker assisted selection in pig enterprises. Livest Prod Sci. 2003;81:197–211. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00257-9. - DOI
    1. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157:1819–1829. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Genetics. 2009;182:343–353. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.100289. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The discount rate. Federal Reserve. 2013. [ http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/discountrate.htm]
    1. Lillehammer M, Meuwissen THE, Sonesson AK. Genomic selection for maternal traits in pigs. J Anim Sci. 2011;89:3908–3916. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4044. - DOI - PubMed