Automated FiO2-SpO2 control system in neonates requiring respiratory support: a comparison of a standard to a narrow SpO2 control range
- PMID: 24885124
- PMCID: PMC4042130
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-130
Automated FiO2-SpO2 control system in neonates requiring respiratory support: a comparison of a standard to a narrow SpO2 control range
Abstract
Background: Managing the oxygen saturation of preterm infants to a target range has been the standard of care for a decade. Changes in target ranges have been shown to significantly impact mortality and morbidity. Selecting and implementing the optimal target range are complicated not only by issues of training, but also the realities of staffing levels and demands. The potential for automatic control is becoming a reality. Results from the evaluation of different systems have been promising and our own experience encouraging.
Methods: This study was conducted in two tertiary level newborn nurseries, routinely using an automated FiO2-SpO2 control system (Avea-CLiO2, Yorba Linda CA, USA). The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the system as used routinely (set control range of 87-93% SpO2), to a narrower higher range (90-93%). We employed a 12-hour cross-over design with the order of control ranges randomly assigned for each of up to three days. The primary prospectively identified end points were time in the 87-93% SpO2 target range, time at SpO2 extremes and the distribution of the SpO2 exposure.
Results: Twenty-one infants completed the study. The infants were born with a median EGA of 27 weeks and studied at a median age of 17 days and weight of 1.08 kg. Their median FiO2 was 0.32; 8 were intubated, and the rest noninvasively supported (7 positive pressure ventilation and 6 CPAP). The control in both arms was excellent, and required less than 2 manual FiO2 adjustments per day. There were no differences in the three primary endpoints. The narrower/higher set control range resulted in tighter control (IQR 3.0 vs. 4.3 p < 0.001), and less time with the SpO2 between 80-86 (6.2% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.006).
Conclusions: We found that a shift in the median of the set control range of an automated FiO2-SpO2 control system had a proportional effect on the median and distribution of SpO2 exposure. We found that a dramatic narrowing of the set control range had a disproportionally smaller impact. Our study points to the potential to optimize SpO2 targeting with an automated control system.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Quicker response results in better SpO2 control - a comparison of 3 FiO2-titration strategies in ventilated preterm infants.Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(4):708-12. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1185781. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015. PMID: 26706983
-
USING THE AUTOMATED FIO2- SPO2 CONTROL IN NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITS IN POLAND. A PRELIMINARY REPORT.Dev Period Med. 2015 Jul-Sep;19(3 Pt 1):263-70. Dev Period Med. 2015. PMID: 26958688
-
Randomised cross-over study of automated oxygen control for preterm infants receiving nasal high flow.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Jul;104(4):F366-F371. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315342. Epub 2018 Nov 21. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019. PMID: 30464005 Clinical Trial.
-
Automated versus manual control of inspired oxygen to target oxygen saturation in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Perinatol. 2018 Apr;38(4):351-360. doi: 10.1038/s41372-017-0037-z. Epub 2018 Jan 2. J Perinatol. 2018. PMID: 29296004
-
Automated control of inspired oxygen (FiO2 ) in preterm infants: Literature review.Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019 Mar;54(3):358-363. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24238. Epub 2019 Jan 10. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019. PMID: 30632296 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of two SpO2 alarm strategies during automated FiO2 control in the NICU: a randomized crossover study.BMC Pediatr. 2019 May 6;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1496-5. BMC Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 31060536 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Advances in respiratory support for high risk newborn infants.Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2015 May 21;1:13. doi: 10.1186/s40748-015-0014-5. eCollection 2015. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2015. PMID: 27057330 Free PMC article.
-
Eligibility Criteria and Representativeness of Randomized Clinical Trials That Include Infants Born Extremely Premature: A Systematic Review.J Pediatr. 2021 Aug;235:63-74.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.04.028. Epub 2021 Apr 21. J Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 33894262 Free PMC article.
-
Neonatal respiratory support strategies-short and long-term respiratory outcomes.Front Pediatr. 2023 Jul 26;11:1212074. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1212074. eCollection 2023. Front Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 37565243 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fully automated predictive intelligent control of oxygenation (PRICO) in resuscitation and ventilation of preterm lambs.Pediatr Res. 2015 Dec;78(6):657-63. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.158. Epub 2015 Aug 31. Pediatr Res. 2015. PMID: 26322409
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases