Plumage condition in laying hens: genetic parameters for direct and indirect effects in two purebred layer lines
- PMID: 24885199
- PMCID: PMC4073196
- DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-33
Plumage condition in laying hens: genetic parameters for direct and indirect effects in two purebred layer lines
Abstract
Background: Feather pecking is a major welfare issue in laying hen industry that leads to mortality. Due to a ban on conventional cages in the EU and on beak trimming in some countries of the EU, feather pecking will become an even bigger problem. Its severity depends both on the victim receiving pecking and on its group mates inflicting pecking (indirect effects), which together determine plumage condition of the victim. Plumage condition may depend, therefore, on both the direct genetic effect of an individual itself and on the indirect genetic effects of its group mates. Here, we present estimated genetic parameters for direct and indirect effects on plumage condition of different body regions in two purebred layer lines, and estimates of genetic correlations between body regions.
Methods: Feather condition scores (FCS) were recorded at 40 weeks of age for neck, back, rump and belly and these four scores were added-up into a total FCS. A classical animal model and a direct-indirect effects model were used to estimate genetic parameters for FCS. In addition, a bivariate model with mortality (0/1) was used to account for mortality before recording FCS. Due to mortality during the first 23 weeks of laying, 5363 (for W1) and 5089 (for WB) FCS records were available.
Results: Total heritable variance for FCS ranged from 1.5% to 9.8% and from 9.8% to 53.6% when estimated respectively with the classical animal and the direct-indirect effects model. The direct-indirect effects model had a significantly higher likelihood. In both lines, 70% to 94% of the estimated total heritable variation in FCS was due to indirect effects. Using bivariate analysis of FCS and mortality did not affect estimates of genetic parameters. Genetic correlations were high between adjacent regions for FCS on neck, back, and rump but moderate to low for belly with other regions.
Conclusion: Our results show that 70% to 94% of the heritable variation in FCS relates to indirect effects, indicating that methods of genetic selection that include indirect genetic effects offer perspectives to improve plumage condition in laying hens. This, in turn could reduce a major welfare problem.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Modelling of feather pecking behavior in beak-trimmed and non-beak-trimmed crossbred laying hens: variance component and trait-based approach.Poult Sci. 2014 Apr;93(4):773-83. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03367. Poult Sci. 2014. PMID: 24706953
-
The effects of environmental enrichment and beak-trimming during the rearing period on subsequent feather damage due to feather-pecking in laying hens.Poult Sci. 2015 May;94(5):852-9. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev061. Epub 2015 Feb 25. Poult Sci. 2015. PMID: 25717088 Clinical Trial.
-
The association between plumage damage and feather-eating in free-range laying hens.Animal. 2016 May;10(5):854-62. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115002608. Animal. 2016. PMID: 27087043
-
A meta-analysis on the effect of environmental enrichment on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens.Poult Sci. 2021 Feb;100(2):397-411. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Nov 19. Poult Sci. 2021. PMID: 33518091 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of litter and additional enrichment elements on the occurrence of feather pecking in pullets and laying hens - A focused review.Vet Med Sci. 2019 Nov;5(4):500-507. doi: 10.1002/vms3.184. Epub 2019 Jul 3. Vet Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 31267678 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Changes in the Plumage and Body Condition, Egg Production, and Mortality of Different Non-Beak-Trimmed Pure Line Laying Hens during the Egg-Laying Period.Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 15;11(2):500. doi: 10.3390/ani11020500. Animals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33671858 Free PMC article.
-
The genetic architecture of socially-affected traits: a GWAS for direct and indirect genetic effects on survival time in laying hens showing cannibalism.Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Jul 23;50(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0409-7. Genet Sel Evol. 2018. PMID: 30037326 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of linear mixed models for genetic feather score analysis in laying hens kept in recurrent testing facilities.Poult Sci. 2025 Feb;104(2):104833. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.104833. Epub 2025 Jan 20. Poult Sci. 2025. PMID: 39879719 Free PMC article.
-
Welfare issues and potential solutions for laying hens in free range and organic production systems: A review based on literature and interviews.Front Vet Sci. 2022 Aug 5;9:952922. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.952922. eCollection 2022. Front Vet Sci. 2022. PMID: 35990274 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Effect of the Type of Non-Caged Housing System, Genotype and Age on the Behaviour of Laying Hens.Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 21;10(12):2450. doi: 10.3390/ani10122450. Animals (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33371385 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Savory CJ. Feather pecking and cannibalism. World Poult Sci J. 1995;51:215–219. doi: 10.1079/WPS19950016. - DOI
-
- Blokhuis HJ, Arkes JG. Some observations on the development of feather-pecking in poultry. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1984;12:145–157. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(84)90104-7. - DOI
-
- Rodenburg TB, De Reu K, Tuyttens FAM. In: Alternative Systems for Poultry: Health, Welfare, and Productivity. Sandilans V, Hocking PM, editor. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2012. Performance, welfare, health and hygiene of laying hens in non-cage systems in comparison with cage systems; pp. 210–224.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources