Attitudes of physicians and patients towards disclosure of genetic information to spouse and first-degree relatives: a case study from Turkey
- PMID: 24885495
- PMCID: PMC4029893
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-39
Attitudes of physicians and patients towards disclosure of genetic information to spouse and first-degree relatives: a case study from Turkey
Abstract
Background: When considering the principle of medical confidentiality, disclosure of genetic information constitutes a special case because of the impact that this information can have on the health and the lives of relatives. The aim of this study is to explore the attitudes of Turkish physicians and patients about sharing information obtained from genetic tests.
Methods: The study was carried out in Kocaeli, Turkey. Participants were either paediatricians and gynaecologists registered in Kocaeli, or patients coming to the genetic diagnosis centre for karyotype analysis in 2008. A self-administered paper questionnaire was given to the physicians, and face-to-face structured interviews were conducted with patients. We used a case study involving a man who was found to be a balanced chromosome carrier as a result of a test conducted after his first baby was born with Down's syndrome. However, he refused to share this information with his wife or his siblings. Percentages of characteristics and preferences of the participants were calculated, and the results were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis test.
Results: A total of 155 physicians (68% response rate) and 104 patients (46% response rate) were participated in the study. Twenty-six percent of physicians and 49% of patients believed that genetic information belongs to the whole family. When participants were asked with whom genetic information should be shared for the case study, most of the physicians and patients thought the physician should inform the spouse (79%, 85%, respectively). They were less likely to support a physician informing a sibling (41%, 53%, respectively); whereas, many thought the testee has an obligation to inform siblings (70%, 94%, respectively).
Conclusions: Although Turkey's national regulations certainly protect the right of privacy of the testee, the participants in our study appear to believe that informing the spouse, who is not personally at risk of serious damage, is the physician's responsibility, while informing siblings, is the testee's responsibility. Therefore we believe that opening ethical discussions with clinicians about the sharing of genetic information, establishing guidelines for practice and sharing these guidelines and the reasons behind them with the wider population, will help to pre-empt ethical dilemmas.
Similar articles
-
Privacy and disclosure in medical genetics examined in an ethics of care.Bioethics. 1991 Jul;5(3):212-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1991.tb00161.x. Bioethics. 1991. PMID: 11659340
-
A challenge to unqualified medical confidentiality.J Med Ethics. 2018 Apr;44(4):248-252. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104359. Epub 2017 Oct 10. J Med Ethics. 2018. PMID: 29018177
-
Genetic diagnostic information and the duty of confidentiality: ethics and law.Med Law Int. 1993;1(1):73-95. doi: 10.1177/096853329300100106. Med Law Int. 1993. PMID: 11659740 No abstract available.
-
[Beyond the diagnosis of a genetic disease, the question of informing the relatives].Ann Pharm Fr. 2009 Jan;67(1):20-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pharma.2008.10.011. Epub 2008 Dec 6. Ann Pharm Fr. 2009. PMID: 19152847 Review. French.
-
The family covenant and genetic testing.Am J Bioeth. 2001 Summer;1(3):3-10. doi: 10.1162/152651601750417784. Am J Bioeth. 2001. PMID: 11954587 Review.
Cited by
-
Social determinants of family health history collection.J Community Genet. 2016 Jan;7(1):57-64. doi: 10.1007/s12687-015-0251-3. Epub 2015 Aug 18. J Community Genet. 2016. PMID: 26280996 Free PMC article.
-
The attitude and behaviors of the different spheres of the community of the United Arab Emirates toward the clinical utility and bioethics of secondary genetic findings: a cross-sectional study.Hum Genomics. 2023 Nov 6;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s40246-023-00548-7. Hum Genomics. 2023. PMID: 37932866 Free PMC article.
-
Non-genetic physicians' knowledge, attitudes and behavior towards medical genetics.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Mar;136(5-6):137-145. doi: 10.1007/s00508-023-02152-0. Epub 2023 Feb 10. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024. PMID: 36763136
-
Reasonable expectations of privacy in non-disclosure of familial genetic risk: What is it reasonable to expect?Eur J Med Genet. 2019 May;62(5):308-315. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Dec 4. Eur J Med Genet. 2019. PMID: 30521983 Free PMC article.
-
'Is this knowledge mine and nobody else's? I don't feel that.' Patient views about consent, confidentiality and information-sharing in genetic medicine.J Med Ethics. 2016 Mar;42(3):174-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102781. Epub 2016 Jan 7. J Med Ethics. 2016. PMID: 26744307 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Murray TH. In: Genetic secrets: Protecting privacy and confidentiality in the genetic era. Rothstein MA, editor. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2007. Genetic exceptionalism and “Future Diaries”: is genetic information different from other medical information? pp. 60–73.
-
- Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
-
- Wertz DC, Fletcher JC, Berg K. Report of Consultants to WHO, Review of Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics. 2003. http://www.who.int/genomics/publications/en/ethical_issuesin_medgenetics....
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical